ArticleArchives of toxicology2025
Evaluation of the cyto- and genotoxicity of two types of cellulose nanomaterials using human intestinal cells and in vitro digestion simulation.
Article in Archives of toxicology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The effects of ingested cellulose nanomaterials on DNA methylation in intestinal cells.Particle and fibre toxicology · 2026Article
- Hazard identification and characterization of leachable chemicals from plastic products - a new PARC project.Frontiers in toxicology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Emerging cellulose nanomaterials (CNMs) may have commercial impacts in multiple sectors, being their application particularly explored in the food sector. Thus, their potential adverse effects in the gastrointestinal tract should be evaluated before marketing. This work aimed to assess the safety of two CNMs (CNF-TEMPO and CMF-ENZ) through the investigation of their cytotoxicity, genotoxicity (comet and micronucleus assays), and capacity to induce reactive oxygen species in human intestinal cells, and their mutagenic effect using the Hprt gene mutation assay. Each toxicity endpoint was analysed after cells exposure to a concentration-range of each CNM or to its digested product, obtained by the application of a standardized static in vitro digestion method. The results showed an absence of cytotoxic effects in intestinal cells, up to the highest concentration tested (200 µg/mL or 25 µg/mL, for non-digested and digested CNMs, respectively). Of note, the cytotoxicity of the digestion control limited the top concentration of digested samples (25 µg/mL) for subsequent assays. Application of a battery of in vitro assays showed that CNF-TEMPO and CMF-ENZ do not induce gene mutations or aneugenic/clastogenic effects. However, due to the observed DNA damage induction, a genotoxic potential cannot be excluded, even though in vitro digestion seems to attenuate the effect. The lowest digested CNF-TEMPO concentration induced chromosomal damage in Caco-2 cells, leading to an equivocal outcome. Ongoing research on epigenotoxic effects of these CNMs samples may strengthen the lines of evidence on their safety when ingested, paving the way for their innovative application in the food industry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.