Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39718602›Full record

ReviewNutrition reviews2025

Diet-Gut Microbiota Relations: Critical Appraisal of Evidence From Studies Using Metagenomics.

Mrunalini Lotankar, Noora Houttu, Kati Mokkala, Kirsi Laitinen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nutrition reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mrunalini LotankarIntegrative Physiology and Pharmacology Unit, Institute of Biomedicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Turku, 20520 Turku, Finland.ORCID 0000-0001-8748-931X
Noora HouttuIntegrative Physiology and Pharmacology Unit, Institute of Biomedicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Turku, 20520 Turku, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-1350-2187
Kati MokkalaIntegrative Physiology and Pharmacology Unit, Institute of Biomedicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Turku, 20520 Turku, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-0354-5546
Kirsi LaitinenIntegrative Physiology and Pharmacology Unit, Institute of Biomedicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Turku, 20520 Turku, Finland.ORCID 0000-0001-5245-8118

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diet may influence the gut microbiota and subsequently affect the host's health. Recent developments in methods analyzing the composition and function of the gut microbiota allow a deeper understanding of diet-gut microbiota relationships. A state-of-the-art methodology, shotgun metagenomics sequencing, offers a higher taxonomic resolution of the gut microbiota at the bacterial species and strain levels, and more accurate information regarding the functional potential of gut microbiota. Here, the available evidence on the relationship between diet and gut microbiota was critically reviewed, focusing on results emerging from recent metagenomics sequencing studies applied in randomized controlled trials and observational studies. The PubMed and Embase databases were used to search publications between January 2011 and September 2023. Thus far, the number of studies is limited, and the study designs and methods utilized have been variable. Nevertheless, the cumulative evidence from interventions relates to dietary fiber as a modifier of bacterial species, such as Anaerostipes hadrus and Faecalibacterium prausnitzii. Furthermore, observational studies have detected associations between different dietary patterns and food groups with certain microbial species. Utilization of metagenomics sequencing is becoming more common and will undoubtedly provide further insights into diet-gut microbiota relationships at the species level as well as their functional pathways in the near future. For reproducible results and to draw reliable conclusions across various studies on diet-gut microbiota relationships, there is a need for harmonization of the study designs and standardized ways of reporting.

Indexed as

DietGastrointestinal MicrobiomeMetagenomicsDietary FiberHumansObservational Studies as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicDietary Fiberdietdietary patterngut microbiotainterventionmetagenomicsshotgun sequencing

Identifiers

PMID39718602
PMCPMC12166168

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.