ArticleACS nano2025
Single-Molecule Observation of Competitive Protein-Protein Interactions Utilizing a Nanopore.
Article in ACS nano, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Time and Length Scales of Incomplete Translocation through Nanopores.The journal of physical chemistry letters · 2025Article
- Hub Occupancy by Competitively Interacting Proteins Obeys a Simple Queuing Law.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2025Article
- Single-cell isolation reveals 5 fluorouracil-resistant subclones in oral squamous cell carcinoma: New insights into stemness and epithelial-mesenchymal transition for targeted therapies.Journal of dental sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Two or more protein ligands may compete against each other to interact transiently with a protein receptor. While this is a ubiquitous phenomenon in cell signaling, existing technologies cannot identify its kinetic complexity because specific subpopulations of binding events of different ligands are hidden in the averaging process in an ensemble. In addition, the limited time resolution of prevailing methods makes detecting and discriminating binding events among diverse interacting partners challenging. Here, we utilize a genetically encoded nanopore sensor to disentangle competitive protein-protein interactions (PPIs) in a one-on-one and label-free fashion. Our measurements involve binary mixtures of protein ligands of varying binding affinity against the same receptor, which was externally immobilized on the nanopore tip. We use the resistive-pulse technique to monitor the kinetics and dynamics of reversible PPIs without the nanopore confinement, with a high-time bandwidth, and at titratable ligand concentrations. In this way, we systematically evaluate how individual protein ligands take their turn to reside on the receptor's binding site. Further, our single-molecule determinations of these interactions are quantitatively compared with data generated by a two-ligand, one-receptor queuing model. The outcomes of this work provide a fundamental basis for future developments aimed at a better mechanistic understanding of competitive PPIs. Moreover, they may also form a platform in drug development pipelines targeting high-complexity PPIs mediated by protein hubs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.