Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39719018›Full record

ReviewJornal de pediatria

Pesticides and human health.

Marina de Barros Rodrigues, Carlos Augusto Mello da Silva, Débora Carla Chong-Silva, Herberto José Chong-Neto

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Jornal de pediatria. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Marina de Barros RodriguesDepartament of Pediatrics, Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR), Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil.
Carlos Augusto Mello da SilvaBoard Certification in Medical Toxicology - Departamento Científico de Toxicologia e Saúde Ambiental da Sociedade Brasileira de Pediatria, Brazil.
Débora Carla Chong-SilvaDepartament of Pediatrics, Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR), Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil.
Herberto José Chong-NetoDepartament of Pediatrics, Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR), Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil. Electronic address: h.chong@uol.com.br.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesto review scientific evidence on the impacts of pesticides on child health, addressing prenatal and postnatal exposures, acute and chronic effects. DATA SOURCE: narrative literature review, using databases such as PubMed, SciELO and Google Scholar. The inclusion criteria involved studies published between 2000 and 2023 that analyzed the relationship between pesticides and child health, including systematic reviews, cohort studies, case-control studies and clinical trials. The descriptors used were "pesticides," "child health," "prenatal exposure," "environmental health," and "developmental toxicity." DATA SYNTHESIS: In this review, an association was observed between exposure to pesticides and the development of neurological and endocrinological diseases, childhood cancer and immunological diseases.

conclusionsPesticides represent a significant risk to children's health, with impacts ranging from neurological alterations to chronic diseases. It is essential to promote regulatory changes and encourage agricultural practices that are less dependent on chemical substances, in addition to investing in research that explores long-term impacts and mitigation strategies.

Indexed as

Child HealthEnvironmental ExposurePesticidesPrenatal Exposure Delayed EffectsChildFemaleHumansNeoplasmsNervous System DiseasesPregnancyPesticidesChild healthEnvironmental healthPesticides

Identifiers

PMID39719018
PMCPMC11962559

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.