Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39719408›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2025

Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients With Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction and With Reduced Ejection Fraction According to the Prognostic Nutritional Index: Findings From PARADIGM-HF and PARAGON-HF.

Simone Solano, Mingming Yang, Paolo Tolomeo, Toru Kondo, Li Shen, Pardeep S Jhund, Inder S Anand, Akshay S Desai, Carolyn S P Lam, Aldo P Maggioni and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Simone SolanoBHF Cardiovascular Research Centre University of Glasgow United Kingdom.
Mingming YangBHF Cardiovascular Research Centre University of Glasgow United Kingdom.
Paolo TolomeoBHF Cardiovascular Research Centre University of Glasgow United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-7289-7695
Toru KondoBHF Cardiovascular Research Centre University of Glasgow United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-6853-7574
Li ShenBHF Cardiovascular Research Centre University of Glasgow United Kingdom.
Pardeep S JhundBHF Cardiovascular Research Centre University of Glasgow United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-4306-5317
Inder S AnandDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine University of Minnesota Minneapolis MN USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1308-4963
Akshay S DesaiCardiovascular Division Brigham and Women's Hospital, and Harvard Medical School Boston MA USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1443-0701
Carolyn S P LamNational Heart Centre Singapore & Duke-National University of Singapore Singapore.ORCID 0000-0003-1903-0018
Aldo P MaggioniANMCO Research Center Heart Care Foundation Florence Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2764-6779
Felipe A MartinezUniversidad Nacional de Córdoba Córdoba Argentina.ORCID 0000-0002-5836-972X
Jean L RouleauInstitut de Cardiologie de Montréal Université de Montréal Montreal QC Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-5353-3877
Muthiah VaduganathanCardiovascular Division Brigham and Women's Hospital, and Harvard Medical School Boston MA USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0885-1953
Dirk J van VeldhuisenDepartment of Cardiology, Thorax Center University Medical Center Groningen The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1611-7935
Faiez ZannadInserm CIC 1433 and Université de Lorraine Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire Nancy France.ORCID 0000-0001-7456-1570
Michael R ZileRHJ Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center Medical University of South Carolina Charleston SC USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7076-221X
Milton PackerBaylor Heart and Vascular Institute Baylor University Medical Center Dallas TX USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1828-2387
Scott D SolomonCardiovascular Division Brigham and Women's Hospital, and Harvard Medical School Boston MA USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3698-9597
John J V McMurrayBHF Cardiovascular Research Centre University of Glasgow United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-6317-3975

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe importance of nutritional status is underappreciated in patients with heart failure (HF). This study aimed to describe the range of the prognostic nutrition index (PNI), and the clinical characteristics and outcomes according to PNI, in patients with HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). The primary outcome was the composite of HF hospitalization or cardiovascular death. METHODS AND

resultsIndividual patient data from the PARAGON-HF (Prospective Comparison of ARNI [Angiotensin Receptor-Neprilysin Inhibitor] with ARB [Angiotensin Receptor Blocker] Global Outcomes in HFpEF) and PARADIGM-HF (Prospective Comparison of ARNI With ACEI [Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor] to Determine Impact on Global Mortality and Morbidity in HF) trials were used to examine patient characteristics and outcomes according to quartiles of PNI. Cox regression was used to analyze clinical outcomes, and multivariable fractional polynomial interaction analysis to examine the effects of sacubitril-valsartan, according to PNI. Patients with lower PNI (poorer nutrition) were older, frailer, and had more comorbidities and worse HF status, with greater congestion. Patients with lower PNI had biomarker abnormalities indicating inflammation, bone marrow suppression, and increased collagen turnover, among other physiologic perturbations. Lower PNI was associated with worse outcomes; that is, the rate of the primary end point among patients in the first quartile was 11.31 (10.20-12.54) compared with 7.09 (6.17-8.14) per 100 person-years in the fourth quartile. These associations persisted after adjustment for other prognostic variables. PNI did not modify the effects of sacubitril-valsartan in HFrEF although sacubitril/valsartan seemed to have a greater benefit in patients with HFpEF with a higher PNI.

conclusionsNutritional status, assessed using PNI, is an independent predictor of poor outcomes in HF. Evaluation of nutritional status in clinical practice, the causes of undernutrition, and whether undernutrition should be a therapeutic target, are all worthy of further investigation in HF.

Indexed as

AminobutyratesAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsAngiotensin Receptor AntagonistsBiphenyl CompoundsDrug CombinationsHeart FailureNutritional StatusNutrition AssessmentStroke VolumeValsartanAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHospitalizationHumansMaleAminobutyratesAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsAngiotensin Receptor AntagonistsBiphenyl CompoundsDrug CombinationsNeprilysinsacubitril and valsartan sodium hydrate drug combinationTetrazolesValsartanheart failuremalnutritionoutcomesprognosissacubitril‐valsartan

Identifiers

PMID39719408
PMCPMC12054463

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.