Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39719414›Full record

ReviewJournal of the American Heart Association2025

Thrombosis, Translational Medicine, and Biomarker Research: Moving the Needle.

Joseph R Shaw, Stephan Nopp, Benedicte Stavik, Kimberley Youkhana, Alison L Michels, Soetkin Kennes, Janusz Rak, Hugo Ten Cate

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Risk Assessment for Venous Thrombosis in Lymphoma and Emerging Biomarkers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Joseph R ShawDepartment of Medicine University of Ottawa, and The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute Ottawa Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2405-7912
Stephan NoppClinical Division of Hematology and Hemostaseology Medical University of Vienna Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-4504-482X
Benedicte StavikDepartment of Hematology and The Research Institute of Internal Medicine Oslo University Hospital Oslo Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-3341-9847
Kimberley YoukhanaMedical University of South Carolina Charleston SC USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3188-4465
Alison L MichelsDepartment of Surgery, Division of Vascular Surgery McMaster University Hamilton Canada.
Soetkin KennesDepartment of Hematology Ghent University Hospital Ghent Belgium.
Janusz RakDepartment of Pediatrics and the Division of Experimental Medicine McGill University Montreal Canada.
Hugo Ten CateCardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht, Maastricht University Maastricht Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7796-4463

Funding

Research Training in Hematology at UNC Chapel HillT32HL007149 · NHLBI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Nigel S. Key · 1985 to 2026
$8.6M
NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL007149
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Arterial and venous thromboembolism are leading causes of morbidity and death worldwide. Despite significant advances in the diagnosis, prognostication, and treatment of thrombotic diseases over the past 3 decades, the adoption of findings stemming from translational biomarker research in clinical practice remains limited. Biomarkers provide an opportunity to enhance our understanding of pathophysiological processes and optimize treatment strategies. They hold the promise of revolutionizing patient care. Still, this potential remains untapped, and several factors impede their use for near-patient applications. We sought to provide an overview of biomarker research in arterial and venous thromboembolic disease. We then aimed to discuss key barriers to the broader clinical implementation of biomarker research and highlight promising strategies to overcome them. We emphasize the merits of translational and implementation science to bridge the gaps from bench to bedside. Innovative trial design, data sharing, and collaborative efforts between academia and industry will be essential. Purposeful regression methodology using rational conceptual framework design, causal mediation analysis, and artificial intelligence might better leverage the use of observational data. Dedicated translational science training programs geared toward educating physicians on the appropriate measurement, interpretation, and integration of biomarker data in clinical practice should foster endorsement by frontline physicians. Finally, we make the case in support of a paradigm shift in cardiovascular medicine. Improved recognition of biomarker research and a greater emphasis on mechanistic evidence can better equip clinicians to deal with the uncertainty that defines the practice of thrombosis medicine.

Indexed as

BiomarkersThrombosisTranslational Research, BiomedicalHumansBiomarkersbiomarkerscardiovascular diseasesevidence‐based medicineimplementation sciencethrombosistranslational science—biomedical

Identifiers

PMID39719414
PMCPMC12054438

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.