Observational studyScientific reports2024
Association of cardiovascular disease on cancer: observational and mendelian randomization analyses.
Observational study in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Income, diet, and cognitive function: observational analyses and candidate metabolomic pathways identified by Mendelian randomization.The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease · 2026Observational
- Clinical Research Progress in the Treatment and Prognosis of Comorbid Coronary Heart Disease and Lung Cancer.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- MiRNA Regulations in Cardiotoxicity Induced by Oncologic Therapies and Possible Immune Response.Current medicinal chemistry · 2026Review
- The mechanisms and therapeutic advances of interactions between breast cancer and cardiovascular diseases.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- Prevalence and clinical risk factors of cardiovascular disease in patients with cancer: a cross-sectional study.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2025Article
- Integrating anamnestic and lifestyle data with sphingolipid levels for risk-based prostate cancer screening.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Observational
- Risk Factors and Prevention of Cancer and CVDs: A Chicken and Egg Situation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Extensive research is needed to examine the association between cardiovascular disease (CVD) and cancer. The observational study is based on data collected from the 2005-2018 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). To assess the connection between CVDs and cancer, we used a weighted multivariable logistic regression analysis with as many confounding factors as feasible included in the model. By employing Mendelian randomization (MR), the unbiased causal relationship between CVDs and cancers was ascertained. The primary analytical approach employed the Inverse Variance Weighted methodology. In cross-sectional study, a positive correlation was observed between CVD and cancer (Model 3, Odds ratio 1.26, 95% confidence interval 1.01 ~ 1.57, p = 0.040). However, MR analysis indicated a negative causal relationship between certain subtypes of CVD and specific cancers, with effect sizes for coronary heart disease and lung cancer (β = - 4.759, p = 0.002), breast cancer (β = - 2.684, p = 0.026), colorectal cancer (β = - 4.581, p = 0.042), liver cancers (β = - 19.264, p = 0.028), and stroke with prostate cancer (β = - 0.299, p = 0.017), with no evidence of a positive correlation. Results from the reverse MR causal analysis revealed a positive correlation between prostate cancer and angina pectoris. An observational study linked CVDs risk to cancer risk. MR analysis has shown that the expected incidence of CVDs can reduce the probability of developing certain forms of cancer. Further investigation is required to examine the clinical correlations and underlying processes between these two illnesses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.