Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39719456›Full record

Observational studyScientific reports2024

Association of cardiovascular disease on cancer: observational and mendelian randomization analyses.

Tongtong Bai, Chengyu Wu

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Tongtong BaiDongfang Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, 100078, Beijing, China.
Chengyu WuSchool of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, No.138, Xianlin Avenue, Qixia District, Nanjing, 210023, Jiangsu, China. 290045@njucm.edu.cn.ORCID 0009-0003-3231-7627

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Extensive research is needed to examine the association between cardiovascular disease (CVD) and cancer. The observational study is based on data collected from the 2005-2018 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). To assess the connection between CVDs and cancer, we used a weighted multivariable logistic regression analysis with as many confounding factors as feasible included in the model. By employing Mendelian randomization (MR), the unbiased causal relationship between CVDs and cancers was ascertained. The primary analytical approach employed the Inverse Variance Weighted methodology. In cross-sectional study, a positive correlation was observed between CVD and cancer (Model 3, Odds ratio 1.26, 95% confidence interval 1.01 ~ 1.57, p = 0.040). However, MR analysis indicated a negative causal relationship between certain subtypes of CVD and specific cancers, with effect sizes for coronary heart disease and lung cancer (β = - 4.759, p = 0.002), breast cancer (β = - 2.684, p = 0.026), colorectal cancer (β = - 4.581, p = 0.042), liver cancers (β = - 19.264, p = 0.028), and stroke with prostate cancer (β = - 0.299, p = 0.017), with no evidence of a positive correlation. Results from the reverse MR causal analysis revealed a positive correlation between prostate cancer and angina pectoris. An observational study linked CVDs risk to cancer risk. MR analysis has shown that the expected incidence of CVDs can reduce the probability of developing certain forms of cancer. Further investigation is required to examine the clinical correlations and underlying processes between these two illnesses.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesMendelian Randomization AnalysisNeoplasmsAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNutrition SurveysRisk FactorsCancerCardiovascular diseaseMendelian randomizationObservational study

Identifiers

PMID39719456
PMCPMC11668899

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.