ArticleJournal of eating disorders2024
SEED-AN and a non-specialised, severe mental illness (SMI) community treatment model: perspectives of professionals and patients of a QoL-focussed treatment.
Article in Journal of eating disorders, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Specialized, integrative treatment for long-standing eating disorders: early insights and implications.Journal of eating disorders · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundImproving care for SEED-AN patients is urgently needed. Current specialist eating disorder (SEDU) programs have minimal impact, resulting in poor quality of life. Flexible assertive community treatment (FACT) focuses on improving the quality of life of people with severe mental illness.
aimThis study systematically examined professionals' and patients' experiences with existing care for SEED AN in two settings in two health districts in the Netherlands. Specifically, the specialised Eating Disorder Unit and FACT.
methodsA qualitative approach was used: Twelve professionals participated in focus groups, and four professionals and six patients were interviewed individually. Reflective thematic analysis was used to analyse the data.
resultsFour themes were constructed: "We feel ignorant in the treatment of SEED-AN patients"; "There is a disability to act"; "We are more than executive practitioners alone"; and "The professionals at FACT have given me back my confidence in treatment". The findings reflect how support for SEED-AN patients is provided by both FACT and SEDU professionals and how SEED-AN patients experience the FACT approach. DISCUSSION: A resource group model promotes collaboration among professionals, patients and the patient's support system. The model is expected to increase knowledge about SEED-AN among stakeholders who support the quality of life of SEED-AN patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.