Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39719903›Full record

ArticleJoint diseases and related surgery2025

Use of nailfold capillaroscopy for the assessment of patients undergoing digit replantation and revascularization.

Muhammed Köroğlu, Mustafa Karakaplan, Sezgin Zontul, Ömer Acet, Hüseyin Utku Özdeş, Emre Ergen, Okan Aslantürk, Kadir Ertem, Şeyma Yaşar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Joint diseases and related surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Muhammed Köroğluİnönü Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Turgut Özal Tıp Merkezi, Ortopedi ve Travmatoloji Anabilim Dalı, 44280 Malatya, Türkiye. m.koroglu91@gmail.com.
Mustafa Karakaplan
Sezgin Zontul
Ömer Acet
Hüseyin Utku Özdeş
Emre Ergen
Okan Aslantürk
Kadir Ertem
Şeyma Yaşar

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesIn this study, we aimed to evaluate microvascular changes using nailfold capillaroscopy in patients who underwent digit replantation and revascularization. PATIENTS AND

methodsA total of 46 patients (34 males, 12 females; mean age: 45.8±17.6 years; range, 18 to 75 years) who underwent replantation or revascularization procedures between February 2012 and May 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. Nailfold capillaroscopy images were assessed for various parameters including capillary count, diameter, dilatation, presence of giant capillaries, capillary disarrangement, microhemorrhages, neoangiogenesis, subpapillary plexus appearance, crossing capillaries, tortuosity, and microaneurysm. We investigated the association between microvascular alterations and clinical outcomes.

resultsOf 46 patients, 25 patients underwent replantation and 21 patients underwent revascularization. Significant microvascular changes, including subpapillary venous plexus, microvascular enlargement, microhemorrhages, neoangiogenesis, and tortuosity were observed in replantation patients (p=0.000

conclusionOur study showed that replantation patients who underwent two nerve repairs exhibited a well-regulated microvascular tone. However, we did not observe a statistically significant relationship between the number of nerve repairs and cold intolerance. Based on these findings, we highlight the potential of nailfold capillaroscopy in detecting microvascular changes following replantation and revascularization, which may contribute to a better understanding of the etiology of neurovascular complications.

Indexed as

Finger InjuriesFingersMicroscopic AngioscopyReplantationAdolescentAdultAgedAmputation, TraumaticCapillariesFemaleHumansMaleMicrocirculationMiddle AgedNailsRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID39719903
PMCPMC11734863

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.