Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39719918›Full record

ArticleJoint diseases and related surgery2025

The effects of gabapentin and pregabalin on fracture healing: A histological, radiological, and biomechanical analysis.

Ahmet Emrah Açan, Mert Emre Aydın, Özgür Bulmuş, Emrah Özcan, Aslı Karakılıç, Gülay Turan, Reşit Buğra Hüsemoğlu Reşit Buğra Hüsemoğlu Reşit Buğra Hüsemoğlu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Joint diseases and related surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ahmet Emrah AçanBalıkesir Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Ortopedi ve Travmatoloji Anabilim Dalı, 10185 Altıeylül, Balıkesir, Türkiye. dremrahacan@hotmail.com.
Mert Emre Aydın
Özgür Bulmuş
Emrah Özcan
Aslı Karakılıç
Gülay Turan
Reşit Buğra Hüsemoğlu Reşit Buğra Hüsemoğlu Reşit Buğra Hüsemoğlu

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study evaluated the impact of different doses of gabapentin and pregabalin on fracture healing in a rat femoral shaft model, with histological, radiological, and biomechanical assessments. MATERIALS AND

methodsSeventy male Wistar albino rats were divided into five groups: control, low-dose gabapentin (GBP-L, 300 mg/day), high-dose gabapentin (GBP-H, 3600 mg/day), low-dose pregabalin (PRG-L, 150 mg/day), and high-dose pregabalin (PRG-H, 600 mg/day), based on human equivalent doses. Bilateral femoral fractures were induced; the right femurs were prepared for radiological examination using microtomography, followed by histological analysis, whereas the left femurs were allocated for biomechanical testing. Drug administration began three weeks preoperatively and continued until sacrifice at either two or four weeks. Histological assessments included inflammation and transformation scoring and microtomography-measured callus volume. Biomechanical testing assessed maximum force and stiffness.

resultsAt the fourth week, inflammation levels were significantly higher in the GBP-H, PRG-L, and PRG-H groups compared to control (p<0.01, p<0.05, and p<0.01), while transformation scores were significantly lower in these groups (p<0.01, p<0.05, and p<0.001). Low-dose pregabalin showed a borderline transformation difference (p=0.051). Microtomography analysis showed that the GBP-H group had significantly reduced callus volume versus control by the second week (p<0.01), persisting at a lower significance by week four (p<0.05). By the fourth week, PRG-H also had reduced callus volume (p<0.05). Maximum force values by the fourth week were significantly lower in the GBP-L, GBP-H, and PRG-H groups compared to control (p<0.05 for GBP-L; p<0.01 for GBP-H and PRG-H).

conclusionThese findings suggest that these drugs, particularly with their high-dose applications, may lead to prolonged inflammation and hinder fracture healing by reducing callus volume and biomechanical integrity, potentially disrupting the transition from the inflammatory to reparative phases of healing.

Indexed as

AminesCyclohexanecarboxylic AcidsFemoral FracturesFracture HealingGabapentingamma-Aminobutyric AcidPregabalinRats, WistarAnalgesicsAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaBony CallusDisease Models, AnimalDose-Response Relationship, DrugMaleRatsAminesAnalgesicsCyclohexanecarboxylic AcidsGabapentingamma-Aminobutyric AcidPregabalin

Identifiers

PMID39719918
PMCPMC11734844

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.