Evidence mapPaperPMID 39720355Full record

ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2024

Glaucoma and dietary intake: a scoping review.

Genesis Daniel Edokpa, Shelly Rose-Marie McFarlane

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Vitamins and nutraceuticals in glaucoma research.European journal of ophthalmology · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Genesis Daniel EdokpaCaribbean Institute for Health Research, University of the West Indies, Kingston, Jamaica.
Shelly Rose-Marie McFarlaneCaribbean Institute for Health Research, University of the West Indies, Kingston, Jamaica.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Studies have suggested that dietary intake may influence the incidence and progression of open-angle glaucoma. However, dietary modification is not usually included in the clinical management of glaucoma. The aim of this scoping review was therefore to map the evidence and determine the nature and extent of research done on "diet and glaucoma" and identify any gaps in this area of scholarship. Materials and methods: A comprehensive search of academic literature was conducted from two relevant electronic databases: PubMed and ScienceDirect. Primary studies that explored the relationship between dietary intake and glaucoma were included if the principal exposure was "diet" and if dietary habits were assessed with dietary questionnaires. The glaucoma outcomes of interest were visual field, retinal nerve fibre layer and/or optic nerve head features. Results: Nineteen studies were included in the final qualitative synthesis. The dates of publication ranged from 2003 to 2023. About 80% of the studies found some significant associations between glaucoma and dietary intake. However, most studies (95%) were observational, i.e., 7 (37%) used a cross-sectional design, 10 (53%) used a prospective cohort design; and 1 (or 5%) used a nested case-control study design. Only 1 study (or 5%) used a randomized intervention trial. Furthermore, while all studies investigated dietary intake with questionnaires, only 2 studies (or 11%) went further to include assessment of nutritional biomarkers. Conclusion: Although miscellaneous evidence supports the concept that diet may play a role in glaucoma, most data are unfortunately observational without proven causality, reporting associations from subjective dietary questionnaires. More well-designed studies are required, especially randomized controlled trials that can prove causality.

Indexed as

dietary habitsdietary intakeglaucomanutritionscoping review

Identifiers

PMID39720355
PMCPMC11666372

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.