ArticleCureus2024
Synergy in Neuroimaging: PET-CT and MRI Fusion for Enhanced Characterization of Brain Pathology.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAccurate diagnosis and understanding of brain disorders are crucial for the best treatment. While multimodal neuroimaging is essential, it has its limitations. Conventional computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provide detailed anatomical information but lack molecular insights, while 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (FDG PET) offers metabolic data but often has limited spatial resolution.
objectiveThis study aimed to assess the potential of combining 18F-FDG PET with MRI to characterize brain disorders compared to standard imaging methods.
methodsFifty patients suspected of having brain tumors underwent 18F-FDG PET-CT and then MRI (including 3D fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR)) after CT scans revealed suspicious lesions. The images were combined and PET-MRI findings were compared to the initial CT interpretations.
resultsThe combination of PET-MRI significantly improved diagnostic accuracy in 20 out of the 50 patients (40%). Importantly, it identified and characterized brain lesions missed by CT in two patients (4%). In patients with known dementia or epilepsy, PET-MRI revealed specific metabolic patterns in affected brain areas.
conclusion18F-FDG PET-MRI fusion shows greater sensitivity and specificity than standard imaging techniques for various brain disorders. It provides valuable insights into structural and functional abnormalities, potentially leading to improved diagnosis, treatment planning, and patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.