ArticleInternational journal of general medicine2024
Risk Prediction Model for Isoniazid Dosing in Tuberculosis Meningitis Patients in Southwest China.
Article in International journal of general medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Tuberculosis meningitis (TBM) has emerged as the most lethal type of disease. The prognosis of meningitis is often related to disease severity and early therapeutic intervention. Methods: Patients were screened for primary TBM and received a quadruple regimen comprising isoniazid (standard dose of 300 mg/day and high dose of 600 mg/day), rifampin, ethambutol, and pyrazinamide. Further, the indices and prognosis factors of diseased patients were analyzed, using 12-month treatment mortality as the primary observation endpoint. Several predictors included demographic data, clinical presentation, ancillary tests, treatment changes, and isoniazid dose. The data were analyzed using a least absolute shrinkage, the selection operator regression, and multi-factor logistic regression. Results: Among the selected TBM patients (n=119), 18 patients were dead at the end of December. A total of 68 influencing factors were screened, in which 5 clinical factors were included as potential prognostic factors, including older age, presence of nausea, high MRC grade, imaging suggestive of cerebral infarction, and dose of isoniazid (300 mg/day). The AUC value was recorded as 0.8316832. The validation set confirmed the model's robustness, with an AUC of 0.887 and good calibration performance. These findings highlight the model's potential for clinical application in optimizing isoniazid dosing. The model demonstrated the advantage of predicting the therapeutic outcome of patients. Conclusion: In summary, the model could be suitable for evaluating the risk of death within 12 months in TBM patients towards assessing the severity and treatment needs of patients. The isoniazid dose is an important factor affecting the prognosis of these patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.