ArticleMolecular genetics and metabolism reports2024
Baseline urinary ALA and PBG as criteria for starting pharmacologic prophylactic treatment in acute intermittent porphyria treated with givosiran.
Article in Molecular genetics and metabolism reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: For patients with acute intermittent porphyria (AIP), a true attack could be difficult to distinguish from chronic abdominal pain. This study focused on treatment responses from two patients with confirmed elevated biochemical data (delta-aminolevulinic acid (ALA), porphobilinogen (PBG)) and clinical evidence for acute attacks before starting givosiran. Methods: Data from patients who participated in the phase III givosiran trial in Taiwan between May 2018 and May 2021 were reviewed. The pre-trial and post-trial biochemical data (urinary ALA/PBG), annualized attack rate (AAR), for two participants were obtained from our hospital record. Results: Two patients had detailed records of biochemical evidence of acute attacks pre-trial (ALA:11.66-79.8 mg/24-h urine collection, PBG:75.45-160.11 mg/24-h). Patient Pb/Gn#1 with a disease duration of 1.6-years, had zero AAR during givosiran treatment. Patient Pb/Gn#2 had received prior hemin prophylaxis, had AIP for 6.7-years, had an AAR of 17.0 before givosiran, and an AAR of 12 at the post-trial compassionate-use period. The change in SF-12 PCS score from baseline was marginally clinical-meaningful (2.8 for Patient Pb/Gn#1 and 2.0 for Patient Pb/Gn#2). Conclusion: Our data from 2 AIP patients with biochemical and clinical evidence of acute attacks suggested that patient with a shorter disease duration may respond better in terms of AAR. Further studies are necessary to understand the association between disease characteristics, treatment history, and optimal treatment response for patients with recurrent AIP in terms of both attack frequency and quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.