ReviewCurrent neurology and neuroscience reports2024
Mobilization in Neurocritical Care: Challenges and Opportunities.
Review in Current neurology and neuroscience reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Early mobilization in the neurotrauma intensive care unit: a service evaluation of current practice and barriers.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Article
- Benchmarking mobilization practice and functional outcomes in traumatic brain injury patients admitted to the intensive care unit: a three-year service evaluation.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Article
- Cyclic Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation as a Priming Intervention in Acute Stroke: A Narrative Review of Rationale and Clinical Perspectives.Progress in rehabilitation medicine · 2026Review
- Review
- Inspiratory Muscle Training and Its Impact on Weaning Success in Mechanically Ventilated ICU Patients: A Systematic Review.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2025Review
- Effectiveness and safety of nurse-led early cognitive and sensory rehabilitation in patients with severe traumatic brain injury: a systematic review protocol.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewMobilization in the Neurological Intensive Care Unit (NICU) significantly improves outcomes and functional recovery while preventing immobility-related complications. The heterogeneity of neurologic conditions necessitates tailored, interdisciplinary mobilization strategies. This article reviews recent research on enhancing the feasibility and effectiveness of mobilization interventions in NICU settings. RECENT
findingsEarly mobilization improves functional outcomes, reduces complications like muscle atrophy and pressure ulcers, and can shorten ICU stays. Safe implementation involves individualized protocols and a multidisciplinary team, emphasizing that early mobilization benefits critically ill neurological patients. Development of evidenced-based protocols for interdisciplinary NICU patient mobilization enhances patient outcomes and quality of life. Use of outcome measures can facilitate mobility while preventing complications from immobility. Future research in embracing emerging technologies such as mobilization equipment and virtual/augmented reality will help determine optimal timing as well as dosage of mobility to improve long-term functional outcomes in the unique NICU population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.