ArticleJournal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute2024
Clinicopathological significance of c-MET and HER2 altered expression in bladder cancer.
Article in Journal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bladder Cancer: Uncovering the Predictive Role of NOTCH as an Emerging Candidate Biomarker for Therapeutic Strategies.Cancers · 2025Review
- Prognostic value of c-MET in oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a study based on the mRNA expression in TCGA database and a meta-analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTumor recurrence or metastasis after surgery is a significant factor influencing bladder cancer (BC) prognosis. Novel molecular biomarkers are necessary to determine each patient's specific outcome because current biomarkers have limited power for predicting prognosis. The proto-oncogene MET encodes c-MET, a tyrosine kinase receptor. When c-MET attaches to its ligand, it triggers several steps in the signal transduction cascade that control cell survival, proliferation, and invasion. c-MET is overexpressed in several carcinomas. The HER2 gene encodes another receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK). HER2 overexpression is linked to altered proliferation and increased aggressiveness in several malignancies. Identifying crosstalk partners of RTKs implicated in bladder cancer development may have a unique role in predicting aggressiveness. This study explored the expression status of c-MET and HER2 in human BC and their clinical significance in disease outcomes.
methodsA quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction was done on 40 BC patients who had undergone transurethral resection (TUR) or radical cystectomy and had a pathologically verified diagnosis of primary tumor without prior chemoradiotherapy as well as 20 patients with benign diseases who served as controls. The c-MET and HER2 expression levels were investigated, and their relationship with clinicopathological features was analyzed.
resultsc-MET and HER2 gene expression were significantly higher, 6.1- and 4.5-fold, in the study group compared to the controls. The frequency of c-MET and HER2 overexpression in the study group was 80% (32/40) and 90% (36/40), respectively. c-MET overexpression was associated with pathological stage(P = 0.002), tumor grade (P = 0.019), muscle invasion (P = 0.008), and node involvement (P = 0.017), while HER2 overexpression was associated with pathological stage(P = 0.033), invasion to muscles (P = 0.003), and node involvement (P = 0.005). Based on the Log-rank test, patients expressing both c-MET and HER2 had the poorest disease-free survival rates among all studied patients (median = 10 m, 3.0-16.9 95%CI).
conclusionThere is a possible correlation between c-MET and HER2 gene overexpression and poor clinical outcomes in patients with BC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.