Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39722456›Full record

ReviewPlant communications2025

RNA modifications in plant biotic interactions.

Linhao Ge, Fuan Pan, Mingxuan Jia, Delphine M Pott, Hao He, Hongying Shan, Rosa Lozano-Durán, Aiming Wang, Xueping Zhou, Fangfang Li

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Plant communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Exploring the CeRNA landscape in plants: advances, methods, and challenges.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. ALKBH1L Is an mPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  9. The role of NTAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Linhao GeState Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China.
Fuan PanState Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China; State Key Laboratory of Rice Biology, Institute of Biotechnology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310058, China.
Mingxuan JiaState Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China.
Delphine M PottDepartment of Plant Biochemistry, Centre for Plant Molecular Biology (ZMBP), Eberhard Karls University, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.
Hao HeState Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China.
Hongying ShanState Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China.
Rosa Lozano-DuránDepartment of Plant Biochemistry, Centre for Plant Molecular Biology (ZMBP), Eberhard Karls University, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.
Aiming WangLondon Research and Development Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, London, ON N5V 4T3, Canada.
Xueping ZhouState Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China; State Key Laboratory of Rice Biology, Institute of Biotechnology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310058, China. Electronic address: zzhou@zju.edu.cn.
Fangfang LiState Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China. Electronic address: lifangfang@caas.cn.

Funding

Non-US Government Research Support type
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The chemical modifications of DNA and proteins are powerful mechanisms for regulating molecular and biological functions, influencing a wide array of signaling pathways in eukaryotes. Recent advancements in epitranscriptomics have shown that RNA modifications play crucial roles in diverse biological processes. Since their discovery in the 1970s, scientists have sought to decipher, identify, and elucidate the functions of these modifications across biological systems. Over the past decade, mounting evidence has demonstrated the importance of RNA modification pathways in plants, prompting significant efforts to decipher their physiological relevance. With the advent of high-resolution mapping techniques for RNA modifications and the gradual uncovering of their biological roles, our understanding of this additional layer of regulation is beginning to take shape. In this review, we summarize recent findings on the major RNA modifications identified in plants, with an emphasis on N6-methyladenosine (m

Indexed as

PlantsRNA, PlantRNA Processing, Post-TranscriptionalAdenosineAnimalsFungiPlant VirusesAdenosineN-methyladenosineRNA, Plantm(6)Am(6)A core componentsN6-methyladenosineplant biotic stressplant–insect interactionsplant–microbe interactionsRNA modifications

Identifiers

PMID39722456
PMCPMC11897454

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.