Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39722649›Full record

ArticleJournal of biological rhythms2025

Incorporating Physical Activity in a New Two-Oscillator Model of Circadian Activity in Nocturnal and Diurnal Mammals.

Anouk W van Beurden, Johanna H Meijer, Jos H T Rohling

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biological rhythms, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Anouk W van BeurdenDepartment of Cell and Chemical Biology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0551-0347
Johanna H MeijerDepartment of Cell and Chemical Biology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Jos H T RohlingDepartment of Cell and Chemical Biology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5721-2715

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In both diurnal and nocturnal species, the neurons in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) generate a daily pattern in which the impulse frequency peaks at midday and is lowest during the night. This pattern, common to both day-active and night-active species, has led to the long-standing notion that their functional difference relies merely on a sign reversal in SCN output. However, recent evidence shows that the response of the SCN to the animal's physical activity is opposite in nocturnal and diurnal animals. This finding suggests the presence of additional differences in the circadian system between nocturnal and diurnal species. We therefore attempted to identify these differences in neuronal network organization using the A-B two-oscillator model, which is comprised of Poincaré like oscillators. Based on this model, we infer that in diurnal animals the feedback from physical activity acts on neuronal subpopulations in the SCN that do not receive light input; in contrast, in nocturnal animals, physical activity acts on light-receptive neurons in the SCN in order to produce high-amplitude circadian rhythms.

Indexed as

Circadian RhythmMammalsModels, BiologicalMotor ActivitySuprachiasmatic NucleusAnimalsLightNeuronscircadian rhythmdiurnalitynocturnalityphysical activityPoincaré modelsuprachiasmatic nucleus

Identifiers

PMID39722649
PMCPMC11834329

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.