ArticleFrontiers in cellular neuroscience2024
The effects of locus coeruleus ablation on mouse brain volume and microstructure evaluated by high-field MRI.
Article in Frontiers in cellular neuroscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The locus coeruleus (LC) produces most of the brain's noradrenaline (NA). Among its many roles, NA is often said to be neuroprotective and important for brain upkeep. For this reason, loss of LC integrity is thought to impact brain volume and microstructure as well as plasticity broadly. LC dysfunction is also a suspected driver in the development of neurodegenerative diseases. Nevertheless, the impact of LC dysfunction on the gross structure and microstructure of normal brains is not well-studied. We employed high-field ex vivo magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to investigate brain volumetrics and microstructure in control (CON) mice and mice with LC ablation (LCA) at two ages, representing the developing brain and the fully matured brain. These whole-brain methods are known to be capable of detecting subtle morphological changes and brain microstructural remodeling. We found mice behavior consistent with histologically confirmed LC ablation. However, MRI showed no difference between CON and LCA groups with regard to brain size, relative regional volumes, or regional microstructural indices. Our findings suggest that LC-NA is not needed for postnatal brain maturation and growth in mice. Nor is it required for maintenance in the normal adult mouse brain, as no atrophy or microstructural aberration is detected after weeks of LC dysfunction. This adds clarity to the often-encountered notion that LC-NA is important for brain "trophic support" as it shows that such effects are likely most relevant to mechanisms related to brain plasticity and neuroprotection in the (pre)diseased brain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.