SynthesisFrontiers in neurology2024
Effectiveness and safety of acupuncture for cancer-related hiccups: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- How effective is acupuncture in treating hot flashes in breast cancer patients? A systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Pooled it
- Effectiveness and safety of acupuncture therapies for intractable hiccups: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Acupuncture and Acupressure for Cancer Symptom Management: an Opinion Statement Based on Preliminary Evidence Mapping.Current treatment options in oncology · 2026Review
- Acupuncture at Cuanzhu (BL2) for persistent hiccups following laryngeal mask airway insertion under general anesthesia: A case series.Medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The use of acupuncture in cancer treatment is expanding. Nevertheless, the efficacy and safety of acupuncture in alleviating cancer-related hiccups remains uncertain and inconclusive. Methods: We conducted a systematic search across eight databases: PubMed, China National Knowledge Infrastructure Database, WanFang, China Science and Technology Journal Database, SinoMed, Web of Science, Cochrane, and Embase, covering the period from their inception to July 2023. Literature was screened based on predefined PICOS inclusion and exclusion criteria, and the risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Data synthesis was performed using Review Manager 5.3 software and R studio 4.4. Additionally, we conducted a frequency analysis of acupoint usage. Results: A total of nine randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 580 patients were included in the analysis. The risk of bias assessment indicated a high risk of bias in all nine RCTs, primarily due to blinding of participants and personnel and random sequence generation (selection bias). The meta-analysis revealed that acupuncture significantly reduced the symptoms of cancer-related hiccups compared to pharmacological treatment (relative risk (RR) = 1.83, 95% confidence interval (CI) [1.53, 2.20], Conclusion: The meta-analysis results suggest that acupuncture has a positive effect on the efficacy rate for cancer-related hiccups, as well as improvements in quality of life and time to effect response. However, due to the high risk of bias and quality limitations of the included studies, no conclusive evidence currently supports the efficacy of acupuncture. High-quality, evidence-based research is still needed to confirm the effectiveness of acupuncture in treating cancer-related hiccups. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, CRD42023451403.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.