SynthesisFrontiers in public health2024
Uptake and determinants of HPV vaccination in South Asia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Social Determinants of Human Papillomavirus Vaccine Uptake Among Adolescent Girls in Low-Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financingPooled it
- Article
- Determinants of HPV vaccine hesitancy in South Asia: a systematic review.Clinical and experimental vaccine research · 2026Review
- Impact of behavioral insights-informed social media campaigns on HPV vaccination in Bangladesh.PLOS global public health · 2026Article
- Pakistan's HPV vaccination drive: navigating trust, culture, and misinformation in a new era of immunization.International journal of public health · 2026Article
- Global burden and projections of cervical cancer attributable to unsafe sex and smoking, 1990-2034.PloS one · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cervical cancer burden in South Asia is among the highest globally. Due to the lack of national immunization programs, the prevalence of human papillomavirus (HPV) infection and vaccine uptake remains unknown. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to determine the prevalence of HPV vaccine uptake in South Asia. Methods: We conducted a comprehensive search of MEDLINE (via PubMed), Embase, the Cochrane Library, and the Web of Science, covering the period from inception to May 20, 2024. We included observational studies reporting HPV vaccine uptake in South Asia, without any language filters or restrictions. The search strategy involved MeSH terms and relevant keywords related to "Papillomavirus Infections," "Vaccination," and "Uptake." MetaXL and STATA were used to perform a proportional meta-analysis and meta-regression analysis. Results: Out of 3,913 articles identified, 17 articles (10,585 participants) were included in the systematic review. The pooled prevalence of vaccine uptake was 8% (95% CI 1-21). There was high heterogeneity between studies ( Conclusion: The findings of this meta-analysis indicate a low pooled prevalence of HPV vaccine uptake (8%) in South Asian countries. The pooled prevalence of adequate knowledge and a favorable attitude toward the vaccine were 41 and 56%, respectively. In the univariate meta-regression model, knowledge of the HPV vaccine uptake was the only significant predictor of vaccine uptake. Systematic review registration: Systematic review is registered at Prospero through the link https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42024547393.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.