ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2024
The embryo stage at fresh ET does not affect the cumulative live birth rate in women with a thin endometrium: a retrospective matched-controlled cohort study.
Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The blastocyst-stage embryo has been considered more advantageous for increasing the cumulative live birth rate (CLBR) at fresh embryo transfer (ET) compared to the cleavage-stage embryo. However, it remains uncertain whether this advantage extends to specialized subpopulations, such as women with thin endometrium (TE), who are characteristic of impaired endometrial receptivity. Thus, this study aims to evaluate the difference in the CLBR between cleavage-stage and blastocyst-stage embryos at fresh ET specifically in women with TE. Methods: A retrospective cohort comprising 1089 women from three centers, ranging from September 2017 to January 2022, was established. These women were diagnosed with TE (defined as endometrium thickness <= 8 mm) and underwent their first fresh ET. To create a comparable cohort between the cleavage and blastocyst groups while adjusting for key covariates, the propensity score matching (PSM) method was employed. The primary outcome assessed was the CLBR per woman. Both cohorts underwent Kaplan-Meier analysis, Cox proportional hazard models, cumulative incidence function (CIF) curve analysis, and Fine-Grey competing risk models to ascertain the impact of embryo stage at fresh ET on CLBR. Additionally, a sensitivity analysis was conducted within a subgroup defining thin endometrium as an endometrium thickness (EMT) < 7 mm. Results: In the matched cohort after PSM, the CLBR was comparable between groups (p=0.331). However, the cleavage-stage fresh ET was associated with an elevated risk of low birth weight (LBW) (p=0.005) and small for gestational age (SGA) (p=0.037). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the median number of embryo transfer cycles was 2 in the cleavage group and 3 in the blastocyst group. The CLBR for the cleavage group reached 78.1%, while the blastocyst group reached 60.0% after 5 cycles of embryo transfers (log-rank test, p=0.09). A multivariable Cox proportional hazard model indicated no significant association between the embryo stage at fresh ET and CLBR (HR=0.80, 95% CI=0.60-1.07). The CIF curve and Fine-Grey competing risk models demonstrated similar results. These analyses were repeated in the original cohort before PSM and in the subgroup with EMT < 7 mm, and the results remained robust. Conclusion: For TE women receiving fresh ET, the choice between the cleavage-stage embryo and the blastocyst-stage embryo yields comparable CLBR. However, selecting the cleavage-stage embryo is associated with increased risks of LBW and SGA births.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.