ArticleCureus2024
Outcomes of Conservatively Managed Patients With Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: A Single-Centre Experience.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe results of patients at one hospital who were judged eligible for conservative care of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) are examined in this research. Optimizing patient care and management tactics requires an understanding of the mortality trends and causes of death within this group. METHODOLOGY: Sunderland Royal Hospital carried out a single-center retrospective analysis between May 2018 and January 2024. Out of the 447 individuals who had a AAA diagnosis, 396 had repairs, while 51 were rejected. Medical records were used to gather information on demographics, aneurysm features, length of survival, and reasons for death. The reasons for death and survival rates were ascertained using statistical analysis.
resultsThirty (58.8%) of the 51 patients had passed away, while 21 (41.1%) were still alive. The remaining 26 fatalities (87%) were ascribed to various causes, such as myocardial infarction (27%), cancer (17%), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (13%), with just four deaths (13%) being caused by ruptured AAA (rAAA). According to the research, the one-year survival rate was 17.6%, and the first six months after choosing not to intervene were when the majority of deaths occurred.
conclusionComorbidities have a substantial influence on outcomes for patients treated conservatively for AAA, as evidenced by the low proportion of rupture-related fatalities. This study emphasizes the need for more investigation, especially large-scale, population-based studies, to gain a better understanding of AAA patient care and outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.