ArticleFrontiers in psychology2024
Executive functioning challenges of adolescents born extremely and very preterm.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Executive function and implications for the Preterm Behavioral Phenotype in very preterm children at age 9-10 years.Journal of neurodevelopmental disorders · 2026Article
- Neonatal brain abnormalities predict preschool executive functioning performance in children born very preterm.Developmental psychology · 2026Article
- Acute Exercise Effects on Cognitive Flexibility in Preterm and Full-Term Children: An Event-Related Potential Study.International journal of medical sciences · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Children born very preterm (VPT; <32 weeks) are at increased risk of executive functioning (EF) difficulties. But less is known about the nature and extent of these executive difficulties during late adolescence, particularly across multiple EF domains and in response to varying degrees of executive demand. Methods: Using data from a prospective longitudinal study, this paper describes the EF profiles of 92 VPT and 68 full-term (FT) adolescents at age 17 years. Relations between gestational age (GA) and later EF performance, in addition to neonatal predictors, were examined. Results: VPT-born adolescents performed less well than FT adolescents across the domains of working memory, planning, and cognitive flexibility, with the largest differences observed for those born <28 weeks GA (effect sizes -0.6 to -1.0 SD), and when task demands were high. The effects of GA on EF outcome were fully mediated by neonatal medical complexity ( Conclusion: Findings support the need for long-term cognitive support for individuals born very preterm, particularly those exposed to high levels of medical and neurological risk, with these factors largely explaining associations between GA and EF outcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.