ArticleThe oncologist2025
Patient-caregiver concordance on death preparedness over Taiwanese cancer patients' last 6 months.
Article in The oncologist, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Saying good-bye or final conversations between terminally ill inpatients and family members in the last weeks of life: a nationwide survey of bereaved families.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWorldwide patient-caregiver concordance on cognitive prognostic awareness (PA) has been extensively examined, but concordance on sufficient (ie, cognitive and emotional) death preparedness is unexplored. We comprehensively examine the evolution of patient-caregiver concordance on death preparedness over the patient's last 6 months. MATERIALS/
methodsThis study re-examined data from 2 cohort studies on 694 dyads of cancer patients and their caregivers recruited from a single medical center in Taiwan. Patient and caregiver death-preparedness states were individually identified by latent transition analysis. Patient-caregiver concordance was examined by percentages and kappa coefficients.
resultsNo-, cognitive-, emotional-, and sufficient-death-preparedness states were identified for both groups. The no-death-preparedness state reflects neither accurate PA nor adequate emotional preparedness for death. The sufficient-death-preparedness state reflects accurate PA and adequate emotional preparedness for death. In the cognitive- and emotional-death-preparedness states, participants had only accurate PA or adequate emotional-death preparedness, respectively. Prevalence of the sufficient-death-preparedness state increased substantially for patients but decreased slightly for caregivers. Membership in the no- and emotional-preparedness states declined throughout the last 6 months with substantially lower prevalence for caregivers than for patients, whereas the prevalence of the cognitive-death-preparedness state increased. Concordance was poor throughout the patient's last 6 months (percent concordance: 31.6% [95% CI, 24.7%, 38.5%]-43.5% [39.2%, 47.9%], kappa: 0.077 [-0.009, 0.162]-0.115 [0.054, 0.176]) with significant improvement in the last month only.
conclusionPoor patient-caregiver concordance on death-preparedness states likely reflects the cultural practice of family-consent prognostic disclosure, patients' adjustment for death, and difficulties in patient-caregiver communication on end-of-life (EOL) issues, indicating targets for improving EOL care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.