Evidence mapPaperPMID 39725521Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of heart failure2025

Empagliflozin in acute myocardial infarction in patients with and without type 2 diabetes: A pre-specified analysis of the EMPACT-MI trial.

Mark C Petrie, Jacob A Udell, Stefan D Anker, Josephine Harrington, W Schuyler Jones, Michaela Mattheus, Tomasz Gasior, Peter van der Meer, Offer Amir, M Cecilia Bahit and 14 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of heart failure, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors.

Mark C Petrie *School of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, British Heart Foundation Glasgow Cardiovascular Research Centre, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Jacob A Udell *Women's College Hospital and Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, Toronto General Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Stefan D AnkerDepartment of Cardiology (CVK) of German Heart Center Charité; Berlin Institute of Health Center for Regenerative Therapies (BCRT), German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK) partner site Berlin, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany.
Josephine HarringtonDuke University Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, and Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC, USA.
W Schuyler JonesDuke University Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, and Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC, USA.
Michaela MattheusBoehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co KG, Ingelheim, Germany.
Tomasz GasiorBoehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Ingelheim, Germany.
Peter van der MeerDepartment of Cardiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Offer AmirHeart Institute, Hadassah Medical Center &The Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel.
M Cecilia BahitINECO Neurociencias Oroño, Fundación INECO, Rosario, Argentina.
Johann BauersachsDepartment of Cardiology and Angiology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Antoni Bayes-GenisHeart Institute, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Barcelona, Spain, and Department of Medicine, Universitat Autònomoa de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Vijay K ChopraMax Super Speciality Hospital, New Delhi, India.
James L JanuzziMassachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Baim Institute for Clinical Research, Boston, MA, USA.
Renato D LopesDuke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
Piotr PonikowskiInstitute of Heart Diseases, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland.
Xavier RosselloHospital Universitari Son Espases, Health Research Institute of the Balearic Islands, University of the Balearic Islands, Palma de Mallorca, Spain.
Morten SchouDepartment of Cardiology, Herlev-Gentofte Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Herlev, Denmark.
Shelley ZierothSection of Cardiology, Max Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Martina BrueckmannBoehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Ingelheim, Germany.
Mikhail SuminBoehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Ingelheim, Germany.
Deepak L BhattMount Sinai Fuster Heart Hospital, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Adrian F HernandezDuke University Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, and Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC, USA.
Javed ButlerBaylor Scott and White Research Institute, Dallas, TX, USA, and Department of Medicine, University of Mississippi, Jackson, MS, USA.

Funding

Boehringer Ingelheim
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsIn the EMPACT-MI trial, empagliflozin reduced heart failure (HF) hospitalizations but not mortality in acute myocardial infarction (MI). Contemporary reports of clinical event rates with and without type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in acute MI trials are sparse. The treatment effect of empagliflozin in those with and without T2DM in acute MI is unknown. METHODS AND

resultsA total of 6522 patients with acute MI with newly reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) to <45%, congestion, or both, were randomized to empagliflozin 10 mg or placebo. The primary endpoint was time to first HF hospitalization or all-cause death. Rates of endpoints with and without T2DM and the efficacy and safety of empagliflozin according to T2DM status were assessed. Overall, 32% had T2DM; 14% had pre-diabetes; 16% were normoglycaemic; 38% had unknown glycaemic status. Patients with T2DM, compared to those without T2DM, were at higher risk of time to first HF hospitalization or all-cause death (hazard ratio [HR] 1.44; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.06-1.95) and all-cause death (HR 1.70; 95% CI 1.13-2.56). T2DM did not confer a higher risk of first HF hospitalization (HR 1.22, 95% CI 0.82-1.83). Empagliflozin reduced first and total HF hospitalizations, but not all-cause mortality, regardless of presence or absence of T2DM. The safety profile of empagliflozin was the same with and without T2DM.

conclusionPatients with acute MI, LVEF <45% and/or congestion who had T2DM were at a higher risk of mortality than those without T2DM. Empagliflozin reduced first and total HF hospitalizations regardless of the presence or absence of T2DM.

Indexed as

Benzhydryl CompoundsDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2GlucosidesMyocardial InfarctionSodium-Glucose Transporter 2 InhibitorsAgedDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHeart FailureHospitalizationHumansMaleMiddle AgedStroke VolumeTreatment OutcomeVentricular Function, LeftBenzhydryl CompoundsempagliflozinGlucosidesSodium-Glucose Transporter 2 InhibitorsAcute myocardial infarctionDiabetesEmpagliflozinHeart failure

Identifiers

PMID39725521
PMCPMC11955319

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.