Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39725810›Full record

ReviewCurrent heart failure reports2024

Disease Network-Based Approaches to Study Comorbidity in Heart Failure: Current State and Future Perspectives.

Sergio Alejandro Gomez-Ochoa, Jan D Lanzer, Rebecca T Levinson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current heart failure reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sergio Alejandro Gomez-OchoaDepartment of General Internal Medicine and Psychosomatics, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 410, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Jan D LanzerInstitute for Computational Biomedicine, Faculty of Medicine, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Rebecca T LevinsonDepartment of General Internal Medicine and Psychosomatics, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 410, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany. rebeccaterrall.levinson@med.uni-heidelberg.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewHeart failure (HF) is often accompanied by a constellation of comorbidities, leading to diverse patient presentations and clinical trajectories. While traditional methods have provided valuable insights into our understanding of HF, network medicine approaches seek to leverage these complex relationships by analyzing disease at a systems level. This review introduces the concepts of network medicine and explores the use of comorbidity networks to study HF and heart disease. RECENT

findingsComorbidity networks are used to understand disease trajectories, predict outcomes, and uncover potential molecular mechanisms through identification of genes and pathways relevant to comorbidity. These networks have shown the importance of non-cardiovascular comorbidities to the clinical journey of patients with HF. However, the community should be aware of important limitations in developing and implementing these methods. Network approaches hold promise for unraveling the impact of comorbidities in the complex presentation and genetics of HF. Methods that consider comorbidity presence and timing have the potential to help optimize management strategies and identify pathophysiological mechanisms.

Indexed as

ComorbidityHeart FailureHumansComorbidityHeart failureNetworks

Identifiers

PMID39725810
PMCPMC11671564

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.