ArticleBMC cancer2024
Pathomics-based machine learning models for predicting pathological complete response and prognosis in locally advanced rectal cancer patients post-neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: insights from two independent institutional studies.
Article in BMC cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Prediction of Pathological Complete Response after Chemoradiation for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Using Machine Learning with Clinical Features, the INTERCEPTOR Study Preliminary Model.Journal of the anus, rectum and colon · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence and computational prediction models for risk stratification, treatment response, and outcomes in colorectal cancer: a narrative review.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- The prognosis value of geriatric nutritional risk index and associated genes in elderly patients with locally advanced rectal cancer following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.Nutrition journal · 2025Article
- Simplified Artificial Intelligence Terminology for Pathologists.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Prognosis and influencing factors of patients with different lymph node statuses after pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer.Oncology letters · 2025Article
- Multi-omics integration and machine learning-driven construction of an immunogenic cell death prognostic model for colon cancer and functional validation of FCGR2A.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
- Machine learning-based identification of proteomic markers in colorectal cancer using UK Biobank data.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAccurate prediction of pathological complete response (pCR) and disease-free survival (DFS) in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) is essential for formulating effective treatment plans. This study aimed to construct and validate the machine learning (ML) models to predict pCR and DFS using pathomics.
methodA retrospective analysis was conducted on 294 patients who received NCRT from two independent institutions. Pathomics from pre-NCRT H&E stains were extracted, and five ML models were developed and validated across two centers using ROC, Kaplan-Meier, time-dependent ROC, and nomogram analyses.
resultAmong the five ML models, the Xgboost (XGB) model demonstrated superior performance in predicting pCR, achieving an AUC of 1.000 (p < 0.001) on the internal data-set and an AUC of 0.950 (p = 0.001) on the external data-set.The XGB model effectively differentiated between high-risk and low-risk prognosis patients across all five centers: internal dataset (DFS, p = 0.002; OS, p = 0.004) and external dataset (DFS, p = 0.074; OS, p = 0.224).Furthermore, the COX regression demonstrated that the tumor length (HR = 1.230, 95%CI: 1.050-1.440, p = 0.010), post-NCRT CEA (HR = 1.716, 95%CI: 1.031- 2.858, p = 0.038), and XGB model score (HR = 0.128, 95%CI: 0.026-0.636, p = 0.012) were independent predictors of DFS after NCRT in the internal data-set.Using COX regression, the nomogram model and time-dependent AUC analysis demonstrated strong predictive discrimination for DFS in LARC patients across two independent institutions.
conclusionThe ML model based on pathomics demonstrated effective prediction of pCR and prognosis in LARC patients. Further validation in larger cohorts is warranted to confirm the findings of this study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.