ArticleHuman genomics2024
Integrating single-cell RNA-seq and bulk RNA-seq to construct a neutrophil prognostic model for predicting prognosis and immune response in oral squamous cell carcinoma.
Article in Human genomics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Novel Disease-Specific Panel of Salivary microRNAs for the Detection of Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma from Early Invasion to Stage IV Disease.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is an aggressive malignancy with poor prognosis. Neutrophil infiltration has been associated with unfavorable outcomes in OSCC, but the underlying molecular mechanisms remain unclear.
methodsThis study integrated single-cell transcriptomics (scRNA-seq) with bulk RNA-seq data to analyze neutrophil infiltration patterns in OSCC and identify key gene modules using weighted gene co-expression network analysis (hdWGCNA). A prognostic model was developed based on univariate and Lasso-Cox regression analyses, stratifying patients into high- and low-risk groups. Immune landscape and drug sensitivity analyses were conducted to explore group-specific differences. Additionally, Mendelian randomization analysis was employed to identify genes causally related to OSCC progression.
resultsSeveral key pathways associated with neutrophil interactions in OSCC progression were identified, leading to the construction of a prognostic model based on significant module genes. The model demonstrated strong predictive performance in distinguishing survival rates between high- and low-risk groups. Immune landscape analysis revealed significant differences in cell infiltration patterns and TIDE scores between the groups. Drug sensitivity analysis highlighted differences in drug responsiveness between high- and low-risk groups.
conclusionThis study elucidates the critical role of neutrophils and their associated gene modules in OSCC progression. The prognostic model provides a novel reference for patient stratification and targeted therapy. These findings offer potential new targets for OSCC diagnosis, prognosis, and immunotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.