ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2024
Hotspots and status of Fetal Alpha-Thalassemia from 2009 to 2023: a bibliometric analysis.
Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: to evaluate the research status and development hotspots of fetal α-thalassemia by quantitatively analyzing the diagnostic status, key areas, related management measures and prospects of the disease by bibliometrics. Methods: The global literature on fetal α-thalassemia and severe α-thalassemia from 2009-2023 in the Web of Science Core Collection (WOSCC) was visually analyzed by VOSviewer and CiteSpace. Results: (1) The examination of the quantity of publications concerning fetal α-thalassemia indicates a rising tendency prior to 2018, followed by a decrease after 2018. (2)The United States, China, Italy, Thailand have published more papers, and the United States has more collaborating countries such as Italy and China. (3) Chiang Mai University and Harvard University are the top two institutions with the highest contribution. However, Chiang Mai University's H index (12) and citation frequency per article (8.05) are relatively low and the NC (6,342), H index (33) and citations per article (75.42) of Harvard University are higher than those of the other institutions. (4) Tongsong T, Gambari R and Fucharoen S are the top three prolific authors. Fucharoen S emerges as the most frequently cited author with 738 citations, excluding self-citations. (5) HEMOGLOBIN leading with 87 published papers (NC:601,IF: 0.82, H-index: 13), followed by BLOOD(58 papers, Nc: 3755, IF: 25.48, H-index: 40) and BLOOD CELLS MOLECULES AND DISEASES(39 papers, Nc: 729, IF: 2.37, H-index: 16). (6) The most cited article was published in science and the second and third cited articles were featured in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences; the top 3 clusters of co-cited literature are "gene editing", "polymorphisms", "hydroxyurea". (7) Keywords analysis showe that the top two categories of keyword cluster focus on the prenatal diagnosis and the current treatment strategy of the disease, which remain the research hotspots. Conclusions: Recent research on this topic has primarily focused on prenatal diagnosis and treatment strategies. A particular area of interest is the ongoing research on gene therapy.The advances in non-invasive diagnosis and therapeutic methods will change the current management approaches for fetal severe α-thalassemia in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.