Trial reportClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2024
A Randomized Pilot Study of Four Dosing Schemes of Sublingual Methazolamide in Glaucoma Patients.
Trial report in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of sublingual methazolamide in patients with open-angle glaucoma (OAG) and inform future trial design. Methods: Fourteen participants (28 eyes) aged 50 to 90 years with bilateral OAG and intraocular pressure (IOP) between 18 and 35 mmHg after medication washout were included. Participants were randomized to receive either 25 mg or 50 mg of sublingual methazolamide once daily for one week, followed by twice-daily administration during the second week. The primary outcome was change in IOP from baseline to days 7 and 14. Secondary outcomes included changes in serum methazolamide levels, serum electrolytes, urine pH and electrolytes, and side effects. Results: After randomization, exclusion, and two dropouts, four patients in the 25 mg group and ten in the 50 mg group completed the study in full. Both doses of sublingual methazolamide resulted in significant reductions in IOP from the post-washout baseline at all follow-up points (all p < 0.05). Lowest mean IOPs were recorded 8 hours post-dose; after a week of daily dosing, the 25 mg and 50 mg groups achieved reductions of 6.6 mmHg (-26.5%) and 4.2 mmHg (-19.3%), respectively (both p < 0.001). Twice-daily dosing resulted in significantly lower morning IOPs compared to once-daily in each group (p = 0.05 for 25 mg; p = 0.003 for 50 mg). Serum methazolamide levels correlated with dose amount and frequency. Serum electrolyte levels were stable throughout, while urinary pH and urinary electrolytes fluctuated based on time since last dose. Side effects of mild headaches and/or fatigue were reported by 3 out of 14 (21.4%) participants, with no serious adverse events. Conclusion: Sublingual methazolamide demonstrated effective IOP reduction with a favorable safety profile. Twice-daily dosing may offer more sustained IOP control. These findings support further investigation into sublingual methazolamide as an alternative glaucoma treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.