ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2024
Ovarian reserve modulates the impact of vitamin D deficiency on assisted reproductive outcomes in patients undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation.
Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The impact of seasonal variations on IVF pregnancy outcomes: a retrospective cohort study in Jinan, China.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The association between vitamin D deficiency and ovarian reserve-specific outcomes of assisted reproductive technology (ART) remains uncertain. This study aimed to investigate the role of ovarian reserve in the association between basal serum vitamin D levels and ART outcomes in patients undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH). Methods: A total of 1,333 infertile women undergoing COH cycles were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into a vitamin D deficiency group (serum vitamin D < 20 ng/mL) and a normal vitamin D group. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to estimate the relationship between vitamin D deficiency and pregnancy outcomes including biochemical pregnancy rate, clinical pregnancy rate, miscarriage rate, and live birth rate in the overall cohort and subgroups with diminished ovarian reserve (DOR) or polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Results: In the entire participants' cohort, no correlation between vitamin D deficiency and pregnancy results was observed ( Conclusion: Vitamin D deficiency does not affect pregnancy outcomes in the overall patient population, but it may negatively impact women with DOR potentially leading to poorer pregnancy outcomes. Further studies are needed to clarify the mechanisms involved and the potential use of vitamin D screening and supplementation in specific populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.