Evidence mapPaperPMID 39728069Full record

ReviewJournal of personalized medicine2024

Decoding Kidney Pathophysiology: Omics-Driven Approaches in Precision Medicine.

Charlotte Delrue, Marijn M Speeckaert

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of personalized medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Charlotte DelrueDepartment of Nephrology, Ghent University Hospital, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.
Marijn M SpeeckaertDepartment of Nephrology, Ghent University Hospital, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-9183-4390

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a major worldwide health concern because of its progressive nature and complex biology. Traditional diagnostic and therapeutic approaches usually fail to account for disease heterogeneity, resulting in low efficacy. Precision medicine offers a novel approach to studying kidney disease by combining omics technologies such as genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics, and epigenomics. By identifying discrete disease subtypes, molecular biomarkers, and therapeutic targets, these technologies pave the way for personalized treatment approaches. Multi-omics integration has enhanced our understanding of CKD by revealing intricate molecular linkages and pathways that contribute to treatment resistance and disease progression. While pharmacogenomics offers insights into expected responses to personalized treatments, single-cell and spatial transcriptomics can be utilized to investigate biological heterogeneity. Despite significant development, challenges persist, including data integration concerns, high costs, and ethical quandaries. Standardized data protocols, collaborative data-sharing frameworks, and advanced computational tools such as machine learning and causal inference models are required to address these challenges. With the advancement of omics technology, nephrology may benefit from improved diagnostic accuracy, risk assessment, and personalized care. By overcoming these barriers, precision medicine has the potential to develop novel techniques for improving patient outcomes in kidney disease treatment.

Indexed as

kidney disease biomarkersmulti-omicsprecision medicine

Identifiers

PMID39728069
PMCPMC11679258

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.