Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39728113›Full record

ReviewMarine drugs2024

Extraction and Analytical Methods for the Characterization of Polyphenols in Marine Microalgae: A Review.

Gabriela Bermudez, Cristina Terenzi, Francesca Medri, Vincenza Andrisano, Serena Montanari

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Marine drugs, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Genome Characterization ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Gabriela BermudezDepartment for Life Quality Studies, University of Bologna, Corso d'Augusto 237, 47921 Rimini, Italy.ORCID 0009-0009-6823-5344
Cristina TerenziDepartment for Life Quality Studies, University of Bologna, Corso d'Augusto 237, 47921 Rimini, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2757-5547
Francesca MedriDepartment for Life Quality Studies, University of Bologna, Corso d'Augusto 237, 47921 Rimini, Italy.
Vincenza AndrisanoDepartment for Life Quality Studies, University of Bologna, Corso d'Augusto 237, 47921 Rimini, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4396-1904
Serena MontanariDepartment for Life Quality Studies, University of Bologna, Corso d'Augusto 237, 47921 Rimini, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7890-3096

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Marine microalgae are emerging as promising sources of polyphenols, renowned for their health-promoting benefits. Recovering polyphenols from microalgae requires suitable treatment and extraction techniques to ensure their release from the biomass and analytical methodologies to assess their efficiency. This review provides a comprehensive comparison of traditional and cutting-edge extraction and analytical procedures applied for polyphenolic characterization in marine microalgae over the past 26 years, with a unique perspective on optimizing their recovery and identification. It addresses (I) cell disruption techniques, including bead milling, high-speed homogenization, pulsed electric field, ultrasonication, microwave, freeze-thawing, and enzymatic/chemical hydrolysis; (II) extraction techniques, such as solid-liquid extraction, ultrasound and microwave-assisted extraction, pressurized-liquid extraction, and supercritical CO

Indexed as

MicroalgaePolyphenolsChromatography, High Pressure LiquidMicrowavesPolyphenolscell disruptionextractionHPLCHPLC-MSHPLC-MS/MSHPLC-Q-TOFmarine microalgaepolyphenolsspectrophotometric methodsultrasounds

Identifiers

PMID39728113
PMCPMC11678617

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.