ReviewJournal of imaging2024
State-of-the-Art Deep Learning Methods for Microscopic Image Segmentation: Applications to Cells, Nuclei, and Tissues.
Review in Journal of imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Geometric Deep Learning-Based Drug Design Models for Small-Molecule Drug Discovery.Molecular informatics · 2026Review
- Development of a 3D nnU-Net-based cell tracking platform for quantifying myocardial deformation in zebrafish.iScience · 2026Article
- AI-Driven Image Analysis for Nanofiber Characterization: From Diameter Measurement to Multiparameter Assessment.ACS omega · 2026Review
- Overcoming resolution constraints in automated colony counting via a high-performance deep learning framework using SAHI.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Deep Learning Integration in Optical Microscopy: Advancements and Applications.Microscopy research and technique · 2026Review
- Foreign Body Response to Neuroimplantation: Machine Learning-Assisted Quantitative Analysis of Astrogliosis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- CG-RecNet: a gated and attention-fused deep learning framework for label-free classification of neural stem cell differentiation via imaging flow cytometry.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Article
- Clinically interpretable deep learning for breast cancer missense variant pathogenicity prediction.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Segmentation of Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinomas: Introducing DRU-Net and Multi-Lens Distortion.Journal of imaging · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Microscopic image segmentation (MIS) is a fundamental task in medical imaging and biological research, essential for precise analysis of cellular structures and tissues. Despite its importance, the segmentation process encounters significant challenges, including variability in imaging conditions, complex biological structures, and artefacts (e.g., noise), which can compromise the accuracy of traditional methods. The emergence of deep learning (DL) has catalyzed substantial advancements in addressing these issues. This systematic literature review (SLR) provides a comprehensive overview of state-of-the-art DL methods developed over the past six years for the segmentation of microscopic images. We critically analyze key contributions, emphasizing how these methods specifically tackle challenges in cell, nucleus, and tissue segmentation. Additionally, we evaluate the datasets and performance metrics employed in these studies. By synthesizing current advancements and identifying gaps in existing approaches, this review not only highlights the transformative potential of DL in enhancing diagnostic accuracy and research efficiency but also suggests directions for future research. The findings of this study have significant implications for improving methodologies in medical and biological applications, ultimately fostering better patient outcomes and advancing scientific understanding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.