Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39728403›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of neonatal screening2024

Digital-Tier Strategy Improves Newborn Screening for Glutaric Aciduria Type 1.

Elaine Zaunseder, Julian Teinert, Nikolas Boy, Sven F Garbade, Saskia Haupt, Patrik Feyh, Georg F Hoffmann, Stefan Kölker, Ulrike Mütze, Vincent Heuveline

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of neonatal screening, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Trial Readiness: Understanding the Natural History of Rare Diseases.Journal of inherited metabolic disease · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Elaine ZaunsederEngineering Mathematics and Computing Lab (EMCL), Interdisciplinary Center for Scientific Computing (IWR), Heidelberg University, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9642-9439
Julian TeinertDivision of Pediatric Neurology and Metabolic Medicine, Department of Pediatrics I, Center for Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Medical Faculty of Heidelberg, Heidelberg University, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6795-4592
Nikolas BoyDivision of Pediatric Neurology and Metabolic Medicine, Department of Pediatrics I, Center for Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Medical Faculty of Heidelberg, Heidelberg University, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Sven F GarbadeDivision of Pediatric Neurology and Metabolic Medicine, Department of Pediatrics I, Center for Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Medical Faculty of Heidelberg, Heidelberg University, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7420-4757
Saskia HauptEngineering Mathematics and Computing Lab (EMCL), Interdisciplinary Center for Scientific Computing (IWR), Heidelberg University, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Patrik FeyhDivision of Pediatric Neurology and Metabolic Medicine, Department of Pediatrics I, Center for Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Medical Faculty of Heidelberg, Heidelberg University, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Georg F HoffmannDivision of Pediatric Neurology and Metabolic Medicine, Department of Pediatrics I, Center for Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Medical Faculty of Heidelberg, Heidelberg University, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6593-896X
Stefan KölkerDivision of Pediatric Neurology and Metabolic Medicine, Department of Pediatrics I, Center for Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Medical Faculty of Heidelberg, Heidelberg University, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5188-9477
Ulrike MützeDivision of Pediatric Neurology and Metabolic Medicine, Department of Pediatrics I, Center for Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Medical Faculty of Heidelberg, Heidelberg University, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4251-7257
Vincent HeuvelineEngineering Mathematics and Computing Lab (EMCL), Interdisciplinary Center for Scientific Computing (IWR), Heidelberg University, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.

Funding

Dietmar Hopp Stiftung 23011221, 1DH2011117 and 1DH1911376Klaus Tschira Foundation Informatics for Life project
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glutaric aciduria type 1 (GA1) is a rare inherited metabolic disease increasingly included in newborn screening (NBS) programs worldwide. Because of the broad biochemical spectrum of individuals with GA1 and the lack of reliable second-tier strategies, NBS for GA1 is still confronted with a high rate of false positives. In this study, we aim to increase the specificity of NBS for GA1 and, hence, to reduce the rate of false positives through machine learning methods. Therefore, we studied NBS profiles from 1,025,953 newborns screened between 2014 and 2023 at the Heidelberg NBS Laboratory, Germany. We identified a significant sex difference, resulting in twice as many false-positives male than female newborns. Moreover, the proposed digital-tier strategy based on logistic regression analysis, ridge regression, and support vector machine reduced the false-positive rate by over 90% compared to regular NBS while identifying all confirmed individuals with GA1 correctly. An in-depth analysis of the profiles revealed that in particular false-positive results with high associated follow-up costs could be reduced significantly. In conclusion, understanding the origin of false-positive NBS and implementing a digital-tier strategy to enhance the specificity of GA1 testing may significantly reduce the burden on newborns and their families from false-positive NBS results.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencedata miningGlutaric acidemia type 1machine learningneonatal screening

Identifiers

PMID39728403
PMCPMC11679506

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.