ArticleInternational journal of neonatal screening2024
Digital-Tier Strategy Improves Newborn Screening for Glutaric Aciduria Type 1.
Article in International journal of neonatal screening, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine Learning, Large Language Models, and Multimodal AI for Diagnosing Pediatric Rare Diseases: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Historical Perspectives, Classification and Diagnostic Approaches of Inborn Errors of Metabolism: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Metabolites · 2026Review
- Trial Readiness: Understanding the Natural History of Rare Diseases.Journal of inherited metabolic disease · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Glutaric aciduria type 1 (GA1) is a rare inherited metabolic disease increasingly included in newborn screening (NBS) programs worldwide. Because of the broad biochemical spectrum of individuals with GA1 and the lack of reliable second-tier strategies, NBS for GA1 is still confronted with a high rate of false positives. In this study, we aim to increase the specificity of NBS for GA1 and, hence, to reduce the rate of false positives through machine learning methods. Therefore, we studied NBS profiles from 1,025,953 newborns screened between 2014 and 2023 at the Heidelberg NBS Laboratory, Germany. We identified a significant sex difference, resulting in twice as many false-positives male than female newborns. Moreover, the proposed digital-tier strategy based on logistic regression analysis, ridge regression, and support vector machine reduced the false-positive rate by over 90% compared to regular NBS while identifying all confirmed individuals with GA1 correctly. An in-depth analysis of the profiles revealed that in particular false-positive results with high associated follow-up costs could be reduced significantly. In conclusion, understanding the origin of false-positive NBS and implementing a digital-tier strategy to enhance the specificity of GA1 testing may significantly reduce the burden on newborns and their families from false-positive NBS results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.