Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39729174›Full record

ArticleTropical animal health and production2024

Selection signatures associated with adaptation in South African Drakensberger, Nguni, and Tuli beef breeds.

Gomo Maxman, Este van Marle-Köster, Simon Frederick Lashmar, Carina Visser

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tropical animal health and production, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Gomo MaxmanDepartment of Animal Science, Faculty of Natural & Agricultural Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa. u22608053@tuks.co.za.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3330-7274
Este van Marle-KösterDepartment of Animal Science, Faculty of Natural & Agricultural Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.
Simon Frederick LashmarAnimal Production, Agricultural Research Council, Pretoria, South Africa.
Carina VisserDepartment of Animal Science, Faculty of Natural & Agricultural Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the present study 1,709 cattle, including 1,118 Drakensberger (DRB), 377 Nguni (NGI), and 214 Tuli (TUL), were genotyped using the GeneSeek® Genomic Profiler™ 150 K bovine SNP panel. A genomic data set of 122,632 quality-filtered single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were used to identify selection signatures within breeds based on conserved runs of homozygosity (ROH) and heterozygosity (ROHet) estimated with the detectRUNS R package. The mean number of ROH per animal varied across breeds ranging from 36.09 ± 12.82 (NGI) to 51.82 ± 21.01 (DRB), and the mean ROH length per breed ranged between 2.31 Mb (NGI) and 3.90 Mb (DRB). The smallest length categories i.e., ROH < 4 Mb were most frequent, indicating historic inbreeding effects for all breeds. The ROH based inbreeding coefficients (F

Indexed as

Polymorphism, Single NucleotideAdaptation, PhysiologicalAnimalsBreedingCattleGenotypeHeterozygoteHomozygoteInbreedingSelection, GeneticSouth AfricaAdaptationCandidate genesIndigenous breedsRuns of homozygositySelection signatures

Identifiers

PMID39729174
PMCPMC11680604

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.