Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39729313›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2024

Changes to the US Preventive Services Task Force Screening Guidelines and Incidence of Breast Cancer.

Carina Zhang-Petersen, Michelle Sowden, Jennifer Chen, Julia Burns, Brian L Sprague

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Carina Zhang-PetersenDepartment of Surgery, University of Vermont, Burlington.
Michelle SowdenDepartment of Surgery, University of Vermont, Burlington.
Jennifer ChenLarner College of Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington.
Julia BurnsDepartment of Surgery, University of Vermont, Burlington.
Brian L SpragueDepartment of Surgery, University of Vermont, Burlington.

Funding

Understanding Factors Influencing COVID-19 Testing and Vaccination in Immigrant Low-income and Homeless Populations and Testing Targeted InterventionsU54GM115516 · NIGMS · MAINEHEALTH · PI CLIFFORD JAMES ROSEN · 2017 to 2026
$51.6M
Vermont Center on Behavior and HealthP20GM103644 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT & ST AGRIC COLLEGE · PI SIGMON, STACEY C · 2013 to 2022
$21.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103644NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM115516
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: The 2009 US Preventive Services Task Force breast cancer screening guideline changes led to decreases in screening mammography, raising concern about potential increases in late-stage disease and more invasive surgical treatments. Objective: To investigate the incidence of breast cancer by stage at diagnosis and surgical treatment before and after the 2009 guideline changes. Design, Setting, and Participants: This population-based, epidemiologic cohort study of women aged 40 years or older used 2004 to 2019 data from the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program. Age- and stage-specific breast cancer incidence rates and the proportion of breast cancers treated by partial mastectomy, total mastectomy, and total mastectomy with reconstruction were calculated. Data analyses were conducted from August 2023 to February 2024. Interventions or Exposures: Age group (40-49, 50-74, and ≥75 years). Main Outcomes and Measures: Annual percent changes (APCs) in stage-specific breast cancer incidence and proportions of cases treated with each surgery type. Results: This cohort study included 2 022 250 women (354 263 [17.5%] aged 40-49 years, 1 279 542 [63.2%] aged 50-74 years, and 388 445 [19.2%] aged ≥75 age group, from a total of 2 023 541 women) diagnosed with breast cancer. Rates of in situ breast cancer decreased since 2009 (eg, APC, -0.69 [95% CI, -2.77 to -0.18] for women aged 50-74 years). Localized breast cancer rates increased steadily during 2004 to 2019 in women aged 40 to 74 years (eg, APC, 1.18 [95% CI, 1.02-1.34] for women aged 50-74 years), with no evidence of a change in trend during the study period. Regional cancer rates decreased or did not change. Distant cancer rates were flat since 2012 among women aged 40 to 74 years and increased steadily for those 75 years or older during 2004 to 2019 (APC, 1.40 [95% CI, 1.00-1.82]). The proportion of cases treated with partial mastectomy decreased during 2004 to 2012 (eg, APC, -0.77 [95% CI, -2.96 to -0.03] among women aged 50-74 years with localized cancer), whereas the proportion of cases treated with total mastectomy with reconstruction increased (eg, APC, 20.17 [95% CI, 16.50-33.16]). During 2012 to 2019, the proportion of cases treated with total mastectomy decreased (eg, APC, -2.44 [95% CI, -3.45 to -1.61] for women aged 50-74 years with localized cancer), and the proportion of cases treated with partial mastectomy increased (eg, APC, 1.70 [95% CI, 0.90-4.08] for women aged 50-74 years). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, in situ breast cancer decreased since 2009, consistent with decreasing use of screening mammography since the 2009 guideline changes, but this decrease did not appear to have translated to more advanced breast cancer stages at diagnosis or decreases in the proportion of cases treated with partial mastectomy. Further research is needed to understand the long-standing increase in localized invasive breast cancer and the decrease in regional invasive breast cancer observed during the past 20 years in the context of decreased breast cancer screening.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerMammographyAdultAdvisory CommitteesAgedCohort StudiesFemaleHumansIncidenceMass ScreeningMastectomyMiddle AgedPractice Guidelines as TopicSEER ProgramUnited States

Identifiers

PMID39729313
PMCPMC11681378

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.