Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39729499›Full record

Observational studyBlood advances2025

Real-world treatment patterns and health care resource use for patients with myelofibrosis: results from the METER study.

Vikas Gupta, Ciprian Tomuleasa, Gilberto Israel Barranco Lampón, Hsin-An Hou, Grzegorz Helbig, Pankit Vachhani, Argiris Symeonidis, Ibrahim Haznedaroglu, Kenny Galvez, Fernando Tatsch and 5 more

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Blood advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT05444972 (A Multi-Country, Real-World Study to Explore Treatment Patterns, Effectiveness and Healthcare Resource Utilization for Patients Diagnosed With Myelofibrosis Through Chart Review), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05444972 completednot on this map

A Multi-Country, Real-World Study to Explore Treatment Patterns, Effectiveness and Healthcare Resource Utilization for Patients Diagnosed With Myelofibrosis Through Chart Review

TypeobservationalSponsorAbbVieRan2022 to 2023Enrolled998ConditionsMyelofibrosis
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Vikas GuptaClinical Cancer Research Unit, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1419-8607
Ciprian TomuleasaMedfuture Research Center for Advanced Medicine, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Gilberto Israel Barranco LampónHematology, Hospital General De México, Mexico City, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-2988-7544
Hsin-An HouDivision of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Grzegorz HelbigDepartment of Haematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-3703-1268
Pankit VachhaniDivision of Hematology and Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine, Birmingham, AL.ORCID 0000-0001-9779-6217
Argiris SymeonidisHematology Division, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Patras, Patras, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-3685-3473
Ibrahim HaznedarogluDepartment of Hematology, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.
Kenny GalvezCancer Unit, Hospital Pablo Tobón Uribe, Medellín, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0003-1192-9053
Fernando TatschGlobal Medical Affairs, AbbVie Inc, North Chicago, IL.
Avijeet S ChopraHEOR, AbbVie Inc, North Chicago, IL.ORCID 0000-0001-6020-488X
Meng ZhangMedical Affairs & Health Technology Assessment Statistics, AbbVie, Inc, North Chicago, IL.
Tamas VizkeletyGlobal Medical Affairs, AbbVie Inc, North Chicago, IL.
Bryan MurrayAbbVie Inc, North Chicago, IL.
David M RossHaematology, Royal Adelaide Hospital and Flinders Medical Centre, Adelaide, SA, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7171-2935

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

abstractMyelofibrosis (MF), a myeloproliferative neoplasm, was most commonly treated with hydroxyurea (HU) before approval of ruxolitinib (RUX), now the standard of care. Factors that influence real-world MF treatment patterns are not well understood. The METER study was a multi-country, retrospective chart review of MF treatment patterns, treatment effectiveness, and health care resource utilization. Of 997 eligible patients, 65.9% had primary MF, and 11.7% were transfusion dependent. Median time from diagnosis to the start of initial treatment (index date) was 29 days (interquartile range [IQR], 1-140). RUX was the most common first-line (1L) therapy (49.0%), followed by HU (40.2%); 48.5% of patients remained on 1L therapy through week 156. Seventy-seven patients underwent allogeneic stem cell transplantation; transplantation was uncommon at 1L, increasing from 2.2% at week 24 to 11.0% at week 156 in patients ≤70 years of age. Median overall survival was 79.1 months (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 70.8 to not estimable [NE]) in all patients, 142.3 months (95% CI, 74.1 to NE) for non-RUX patients, 77.6 months (95% CI, 64.2-85.9) for patients on RUX 1L therapy, and 72.6 months (95% CI, 62.0 to NE) for RUX 2L+ patients. Of patients who experienced ≥1 corresponding event, the median hospital length of stay (LoS; n = 520), intensive care unit LoS (n = 71), and number of transfusions (n = 375) were 16 days (IQR, 7-37), 5 days (IQR, 2-13), and 12 (IQR, 4-26), respectively. Despite improvements, there were numerous hospitalization and transfusion events among these patients in routine practice. This trial was registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov as #NCT05444972.

Indexed as

Health ResourcesPrimary MyelofibrosisAgedFemaleHumansHydroxyureaMaleMiddle AgedNitrilesPyrazolesPyrimidinesRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeHydroxyureaNitrilesPyrazolesPyrimidinesruxolitinib

Identifiers

PMID39729499
PMCPMC11914159

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.