Observational studyBlood advances2025
Real-world treatment patterns and health care resource use for patients with myelofibrosis: results from the METER study.
Observational study in Blood advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT05444972 (A Multi-Country, Real-World Study to Explore Treatment Patterns, Effectiveness and Healthcare Resource Utilization for Patients Diagnosed With Myelofibrosis Through Chart Review), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Multi-Country, Real-World Study to Explore Treatment Patterns, Effectiveness and Healthcare Resource Utilization for Patients Diagnosed With Myelofibrosis Through Chart Review
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Clinical and prognostic significance of concomitant autoimmune disease in patients with myelofibrosis.Annals of hematology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
abstractMyelofibrosis (MF), a myeloproliferative neoplasm, was most commonly treated with hydroxyurea (HU) before approval of ruxolitinib (RUX), now the standard of care. Factors that influence real-world MF treatment patterns are not well understood. The METER study was a multi-country, retrospective chart review of MF treatment patterns, treatment effectiveness, and health care resource utilization. Of 997 eligible patients, 65.9% had primary MF, and 11.7% were transfusion dependent. Median time from diagnosis to the start of initial treatment (index date) was 29 days (interquartile range [IQR], 1-140). RUX was the most common first-line (1L) therapy (49.0%), followed by HU (40.2%); 48.5% of patients remained on 1L therapy through week 156. Seventy-seven patients underwent allogeneic stem cell transplantation; transplantation was uncommon at 1L, increasing from 2.2% at week 24 to 11.0% at week 156 in patients ≤70 years of age. Median overall survival was 79.1 months (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 70.8 to not estimable [NE]) in all patients, 142.3 months (95% CI, 74.1 to NE) for non-RUX patients, 77.6 months (95% CI, 64.2-85.9) for patients on RUX 1L therapy, and 72.6 months (95% CI, 62.0 to NE) for RUX 2L+ patients. Of patients who experienced ≥1 corresponding event, the median hospital length of stay (LoS; n = 520), intensive care unit LoS (n = 71), and number of transfusions (n = 375) were 16 days (IQR, 7-37), 5 days (IQR, 2-13), and 12 (IQR, 4-26), respectively. Despite improvements, there were numerous hospitalization and transfusion events among these patients in routine practice. This trial was registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov as #NCT05444972.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.