Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39729551›Full record

ArticleAnalytical chemistry2025

A Software Tool for Rapid and Automated Preprocessing of Large-Scale Serum Metabolomic Data by Multisegment Injection-Capillary Electrophoresis-Mass Spectrometry.

Erick Helmeczi, Zachary Kroezen, Meera Shanmuganathan, Ana Ruxandra Stanciu, Vanessa Martinez, Natasia Kurysko, Paula Normando, Inês Rugani Ribeiro de Castro, Raquel Machado Schincaglia, Gilberto Kac and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Analytical chemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Erick HelmecziDepartment of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4M1, Canada.
Zachary KroezenDepartment of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4M1, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-9415-7604
Meera ShanmuganathanDepartment of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4M1, Canada.
Ana Ruxandra StanciuDepartment of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4M1, Canada.
Vanessa MartinezDepartment of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4M1, Canada.
Natasia KuryskoDepartment of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4M1, Canada.
Paula NormandoNutritional Epidemiology Observatory, Josué de Castro Nutrition Institute, Rio de Janeiro Federal University, Rio de Janeiro 21941-902, Brazil.
Inês Rugani Ribeiro de CastroInstitute of Nutrition, Rio de Janeiro State University, Rio de Janeiro 20559-900, Brazil.
Raquel Machado SchincagliaFaculty of Nutrition, Federal University of Goias, Goiânia 74605-220, Brazil.
Gilberto KacNutritional Epidemiology Observatory, Josué de Castro Nutrition Institute, Rio de Janeiro Federal University, Rio de Janeiro 21941-902, Brazil.
Philip Britz-McKibbinDepartment of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4M1, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-9296-3223

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mass spectrometry (MS)-based metabolomics often rely on separation techniques when analyzing complex biological specimens to improve method resolution, metabolome coverage, quantitative performance, and/or unknown identification. However, low sample throughput and complicated data preprocessing procedures remain major barriers to affordable metabolomic studies that are scalable to large populations. Herein, we introduce PeakMeister as a new software tool in the R statistical environment to enable standardized processing of serum metabolomic data acquired by multisegment injection-capillary electrophoresis-mass spectrometry (MSI-CE-MS), a high-throughput separation platform (<4 min/sample) which takes advantage of a serial injection format of 13 samples within a single analytical run. We performed a rigorous validation of PeakMeister by analyzing 47 cationic metabolites consistently measured in 5,000 serum and 420 quality control samples from the Brazilian National Survey on Child Nutrition (ENANI-2019) comprising a total of 224,983 metabolite peaks acquired in 40 days across three batches over an eight-month period. A migration time index using a panel of 11 internal standards was introduced to correct for large variations in migration times, which allowed for reliable peak annotation, peak integration, and sample position assignment for serum metabolites having two flanking internal standards or a single comigrating stable-isotope internal standard. PeakMeister accelerated data preprocessing times by 30-fold compared to manual processing of MSI-CE-MS data by an experienced analyst using vendor software, while also achieving excellent peak annotation fidelity (median accuracy >99.9%), acceptable intermediate precision (median CV = 16.0%), consistent metabolite peak integration (mean bias = -2.1%), and good mutual agreement when quantifying 16 plasma metabolites from NIST SRM-1950 (mean bias = -1.3%). Reference ranges are also reported for 40 serum metabolites in a national nutritional survey of Brazilian children under 5 years of age from the ENANI-2019 study. MSI-CE-MS in conjunction with PeakMeister allows for rapid and automated processing of large-scale metabolomic studies that tolerate nonlinear migration time shifts without complicated dynamic time warping or effective mobility scale transformations.

Indexed as

MetabolomicsSoftwareAutomationElectrophoresis, CapillaryHumansMass Spectrometry

Identifiers

PMID39729551
PMCPMC11740174

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.