ReviewJournal of molecular cell biology2025
Application of nanomedicines in tumor immunotherapy.
Review in Journal of molecular cell biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Electrosprayed PLGA Nanoparticles for Dual Drug Delivery: Design, Optimization and Applications.Polymers · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence-assisted spatial omics-based biomimetic nanoplatform for intelligent and precise intervention in the immunosuppressive core region of ovarian cancer.NPJ precision oncology · 2026Review
- AI-driven nanomedicine for cancer theranostics.Molecular cancer · 2026Review
- Biomimetic Polymer-Based Nanomaterials for Immune-Responsive Hepatocellular Carcinoma Therapy.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- Advances in nanocarrier-mediated cancer therapy: Progress in immunotherapy, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy.Chinese medical journal · 2025Review
- Exo-nanomaterials in cancer immunotherapy: reprogramming the tumor immune microenvironment.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Tumor immunotherapy has emerged as a formidable strategy, demonstrating substantial achievements in the field of cancer treatment. Despite its remarkable success, intrinsic limitations such as insufficient targeting capabilities, side effects, and resistance to immunotherapy hinder its efficacy. To address these challenges, the utilization of nanomedicines in tumor immunotherapy has been broadly explored, capitalizing on their advantages of targeting delivery capability, loading capacity, modifiability, and biocompatibility. Through rational design approaches, nanomedicines are engineered to meet diverse delivery requirements and synergize with different regimens to maximize therapeutic efficacy while alleviating side effects. This review initially discusses the challenges associated with tumor immunotherapy and underscores the pivotal role played by nanomedicines in overcoming these obstacles. Subsequently, representative types of nanoparticles are systematically introduced based on their structural properties, advantages, potential limitations, and future research directions. Special emphasis is placed on recent advancements in a range of nanomedicines designed for specific tumor immunotherapy strategies. Finally, the clinical applications as well as prospects of nanomedicines are discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.