Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39730390›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Distilling the knowledge from large-language model for health event prediction.

Sirui Ding, Jiancheng Ye, Xia Hu, Na Zou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Automated Skin Cancer Report Generation via a Knowledge-Distilled Vision-Language Model.IEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions · 2025
    Article
  14. RaiLED-AD: Rationale-Guided Knowledge Transfer for Alzheimer's Disease Prediction from Electronic Health Records.Proceedings. IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sirui DingDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.
Jiancheng YeWeill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Xia HuDepartment of Computer Science, Rice University, Houston, TX, USA.
Na ZouDepartment of Industrial Engineering, University of Houston, Houston, TX, USA. nzou2@uh.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Health event prediction is empowered by the rapid and wide application of electronic health records (EHR). In the Intensive Care Unit (ICU), precisely predicting the health related events in advance is essential for providing treatment and intervention to improve the patients outcomes. EHR is a kind of multi-modal data containing clinical text, time series, structured data, etc. Most health event prediction works focus on a single modality, e.g., text or tabular EHR. How to effectively learn from the multi-modal EHR for health event prediction remains a challenge. Inspired by the strong capability in text processing of large language model (LLM), we propose the framework CKLE for health event prediction by distilling the knowledge from LLM and learning from multi-modal EHR. There are two challenges of applying LLM in the health event prediction, the first one is most LLM can only handle text data rather than other modalities, e.g., structured data. The second challenge is the privacy issue of health applications requires the LLM to be locally deployed, which may be limited by the computational resource. CKLE solves the challenges of LLM scalability and portability in the healthcare domain by distilling the cross-modality knowledge from LLM into the health event predictive model. To fully take advantage of the strong power of LLM, the raw clinical text is refined and augmented with prompt learning. The embedding of clinical text are generated by LLM. To effectively distill the knowledge of LLM into the predictive model, we design a cross-modality knowledge distillation (KD) method. A specially designed training objective will be used for the KD process with the consideration of multiple modality and patient similarity. The KD loss function consists of two parts. The first one is cross-modality contrastive loss function, which models the correlation of different modalities from the same patient. The second one is patient similarity learning loss function to model the correlations between similar patients. The cross-modality knowledge distillation can distill the rich information in clinical text and the knowledge of LLM into the predictive model on structured EHR data. To demonstrate the effectiveness of CKLE, we evaluate CKLE on two health event prediction tasks in the field of cardiology, heart failure prediction and hypertension prediction. We select the 7125 patients from MIMIC-III dataset and split them into train/validation/test sets. We can achieve a maximum 4.48% improvement in accuracy compared to state-of-the-art predictive model designed for health event prediction. The results demonstrate CKLE can surpass the baseline prediction models significantly on both normal and limited label settings. We also conduct the case study on cardiology disease analysis in the heart failure and hypertension prediction. Through the feature importance calculation, we analyse the salient features related to the cardiology disease which corresponds to the medical domain knowledge. The superior performance and interpretability of CKLE pave a promising way to leverage the power and knowledge of LLM in the health event prediction in real-world clinical settings.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsHumansIntensive Care UnitsMachine LearningNatural Language ProcessingCardiovascular diseaseHealth event predictionKnowledge distillationLarge-language modelMulti-modal learning

Identifiers

PMID39730390
PMCPMC11680798

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.