ArticleScientific reports2024
Interpretable machine learning-driven biomarker identification and validation for Alzheimer's disease.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Transcriptomic analysis reveals and validates lipid raft-associated biomarkers and functional networks in Alzheimer's disease.IBRO neuroscience reports · 2026Article
- Machine Learning and Multimodal Biomarker Discovery in Alzheimer's Disease.Brain sciences · 2026Review
- An Exploratory Six-Probe Blood RNA Signature for Predicting 12-Month Cognitive Decline Along the Alzheimer's Disease Continuum: An Interpretable Machine Learning Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Multi-Omics Integration and Causal Inference Identify HSD17B1 as a Potential Nobiletin Target Linking Neurosteroid Metabolism to Alzheimer's Disease.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Discovering non-linear dynamics of miRNAs in Alzheimer's disease-related cognitive impairment: a cross-species approach with explainable machine learning.Biology direct · 2026Article
- Beyond Feature Selection: Interpretable Machine Learning for Mechanistic Insights in Metabolomics.Biology · 2026Review
- ATN Classification and Machine-Learned Plasma Biomarker Phenotypes Reveal Distinct Alzheimer's Pathology in a Population-Based Cohort.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- The Expanding Role of Non-Coding RNAs in Neurodegenerative Diseases: From Biomarkers to Therapeutic Targets.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- The spatial revolution in immuno-oncology: artificial intelligence decoding NK cell niches to predict therapeutic response.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Article
- Machine Learning Approaches for Optimizing Drug Combinations in Neurodegenerative Diseases: A Brief Review.ACS omega · 2025Review
- Development of an explainable machine learning model for Alzheimer's disease prediction using clinical and behavioural features.MethodsX · 2025Article
- Integrating explainable artificial intelligence with multiomics systems biology and electronic health record data mining for personalized drug repurposing in Alzheimer's disease.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Integrating explainable AI with multiomics systems biology and EHR data mining for personalized drug repurposing in Alzheimer's disease.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a neurodegenerative disorder characterized by limited effective treatments, underscoring the critical need for early detection and diagnosis to improve intervention outcomes. This study integrates various bioinformatics methodologies with interpretable machine learning to identify reliable biomarkers for AD diagnosis and treatment. By leveraging differentially expressed genes (DEGs) analysis, weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA), and construction of Protein-Protein Interaction (PPI) Networks, we meticulously analyzed the AD dataset from the GEO database to pinpoint Hub genes. Subsequently, various machine learning algorithms were employed to construct diagnostic models, which were then elucidated using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP). To visualize our findings, we generated an insightful bioinformatics map of 10 Hub genes. We then conducted experimental validation on less-studied Hub genes, revealing significant differential mRNA expression of MYH9 and RHOQ in an AD cell model. Finally, we explored the biological significance of these two genes at the single-cell transcriptome level. This study not only introduces interactive SHAP panels for precise decision-making in AD but also offers novel insights into the identification of AD biomarkers through interpretable machine learning diagnostic models. Particularly, MYH9 has emerged as a promising new potential biomarker, pointing the way towards enhanced diagnostic accuracy and personalized therapeutic strategies for AD. Although the mRNA expression patterns of RHOQ are opposite in AD cell models and human brain tissue samples, the role of RHOQ in AD remains worthy of further exploration due to the diversity and complexity of biological molecular regulation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.