Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39730472›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Prediction of late-onset preeclampsia using plasma proteomics: a longitudinal multi-cohort study.

Ina J Andresen, Manuela Zucknick, Maren-Helene L Degnes, Martin S Angst, Nima Aghaeepour, Roberto Romero, Marie Cecilie P Roland, Adi L Tarca, Ane Cecilie Westerberg, Trond M Michelsen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ina J AndresenDepartment of Obstetrics, Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oslo University Hospital Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway. injand@ous-hf.no.
Manuela ZucknickOslo Centre for Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Maren-Helene L DegnesDepartment of Obstetrics, Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oslo University Hospital Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway.
Martin S AngstDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Nima AghaeepourDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Roberto RomeroPregnancy Research Branch, Division of Obstetrics and Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Division of Intramural Research, US Department of Health and Human Services (NICHD/NIH/DHHS), Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, MD and Detroit, Bethesda, MI, USA.
Marie Cecilie P RolandDepartment of Obstetrics, Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oslo University Hospital Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway.
Adi L TarcaCenter for Molecular Medicine and Genetics, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA.
Ane Cecilie Westerberg *Department of Obstetrics, Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oslo University Hospital Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway.
Trond M Michelsen *Department of Obstetrics, Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oslo University Hospital Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway. trmi1@ous-hf.no.

Funding

Machine Learning for Integrative Modeling of the Immune System in Clinical SettingsR35GM138353 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI AGHAEEPOUR, NIMA · 2020 to 2024
$2.2M
NICHD NIH HHS HHSN275201300006CNIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM138353
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Preeclampsia is a pregnancy disorder with substantial perinatal and maternal morbidity and mortality. Pregnant women at risk of preeclampsia would benefit from early detection for follow-up, timely interventions and delivery. Several attempts have been made to identify protein biomarkers of preeclampsia, but findings vary with demographics, clinical characteristics, and time of sampling. In the current study, we combined three independent longitudinal pregnancy cohorts (Detroit, Stanford and Oslo) resulting in 124 late-onset preeclampsia (LOPE) cases and 178 gestational age matched controls, and analyzed > 1000 proteins in maternal plasma sampled between 12 and 34 weeks of gestation. Differential abundance analysis of combined protein data revealed increased deviation in protein abundance trajectories throughout gestation in women destined to develop LOPE compared to controls. There were no differentially abundant proteins at time interval T1 (12-19 weeks), yet 31 differentially abundant proteins were found at time interval T2 (19-27 weeks), and 48 proteins at time interval T3 (27- 34 weeks). Multi-protein random forest models assessed via cross-validation predicted LOPE with an area under the ROC curve of 0.72 (0.65-0.78), 0.76 (0.71-0.81) and 0.80 (0.75-0.85) at time interval T1, T2 and T3, respectively. The results at T3 were confirmed using a leave-one-cohort-out analysis suggesting cross-cohort consistency, and at T1 and T2 when the largest two cohorts were used as training sets.

Indexed as

BiomarkersPre-EclampsiaProteomicsAdultBlood ProteinsCase-Control StudiesCohort StudiesFemaleGestational AgeHumansLongitudinal StudiesPregnancyROC CurveBiomarkersBlood ProteinsBiomarkersLongitudinalPredictionPreeclampsiaPregnancyProteomics

Identifiers

PMID39730472
PMCPMC11681054

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.