ArticleScientific reports2024
LieRHRV system for remote lie detection using heart rate variability parameters.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The prophet's rite of passage - pitfalls in evaluating real-time prediction in medicine.Frontiers in physiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The standard polygraph, or lie detector, is limited by its reliance on average heart rate, subjective examiner interpretation, and the need for direct subject contact. Remote photoplethysmography (rPPG) offers a promising contactless alternative, by using facial videos to extract heart rate variability (HRV). We introduce "LieRHRV," a remote lie detection algorithm based solely on extracted HRV parameters. To test the HRV parameter quality, we compared these parameters to HRV parameters extracted from ECG and photoplethysmography (PPG) records archived in five gold-standard ECG/PPG datasets. A prospective study of 39 healthy volunteers was also performed to evaluate the accuracy of lie detection based on PPG- or rPPG-derived HRV parameters. Effective HRV parameter extraction from both PPG and ECG sources was demonstrated, with comparable outcomes among 60% of the parameters on average with the publicly available datasets, and prospective study with 80% of the parameters. LieRHRV performance on ECG, PPG or rPPG (with parameters selected for PPG) exhibited an accuracy of 83.3 ± 3%, 87.3 ± 4% or 91.7 ± 3.5%, respectively. In comparison, the naïve model for ECG, PPG or rPPG data achieved an accuracy of 58.3 ± 3%, 61.0 ± 3% or 67.0 ± 5%, respectively. This study demonstrated the feasibility and effectiveness of LieRHRV, and offers a promising avenue for advancing lie detection technologies beyond polygraph limitations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.