ArticleScientific reports2024
A machine learning-based immune response signature to facilitate prognosis prediction in patients with endometrial cancer.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- VEGFC as a prognostic cytokine biomarker linking lymph node metastasis to immune suppression in breast cancer.European cytokine network · 2026Article
- Integrating artificial intelligence and multi-omics data for precision oncology in endometrial cancer: a narrative review.Functional & integrative genomics · 2026Review
- Predictive biomarkers of response to immune checkpoint inhibitors in mismatch repair-deficient endometrial cancer.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Endometrial cancer is the most prevalent form of gynecologic malignancy, with a significant surge in incidence among youngsters. Although the advent of the immunotherapy era has profoundly improved patient outcomes, not all patients benefit from immunotherapy; some patients experience hyperprogression while on immunotherapy. Hence, there is a pressing need to further delineate the distinct immune response profiles in patients with endometrial cancer to enhance prognosis prediction and facilitate the prediction of immunotherapeutic responses. The ssGSEA method was used to evaluate the activities of the immune response pathways in patients with endometrial cancer. Unsupervised clustering was employed to identify the different immune response patterns. WGCNA was employed to identify the genes that highly correlated with the immune response patterns observed. Ninety-five machine learning combinations were utilized to identify the optimal prognosis model and the novel biomarker, SLC38A3. Experiments such as cell invasion, migration, scratch, and in vivo tumorigenicity were performed to determine the function of SLC28A3. Molecular docking techniques were employed to determine the targeted action of periodate-oxidized adenosine on SLC38A3. Patients exhibited both immune response-suppressing C1 phenotypes and immune response-activating C2 phenotypes, with significant differences in prognosis between these two phenotypes. WGCNA identified 418 genes that highly correlated with the immune response phenotypes, of which 69 genes were associated with prognosis. The immune response-related score (IRRS) established by multiple machine learning frameworks demonstrated stability in predicting patient prognosis and immune status. High expression of SLC38A3 contributes to cellular malignant traits, and periodate-oxidized adenosine bound stably to SLC38A3. IRRS accurately predicts disease prognosis and immune status in patients with endometrial cancer. SLC38A3 serves as a prognostic marker for these patients and can be stably targeted by periodate-oxidized adenosine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.