Evidence mapPaperPMID 39730507Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

A machine learning-based immune response signature to facilitate prognosis prediction in patients with endometrial cancer.

Xiaofeng Wang, Jing Guan, Li Feng, Qingxue Li, Liwei Zhao, Yue Li, Ruixiao Ma, Mengnan Shi, Biaogang Han, Guorong Hao and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Xiaofeng Wang *Department of Oncology, The Fourth Hospital of Shijiazhuang, Shijiazhuang, Hebei Province, China.
Jing Guan *Department of Radiology, The Fourth Hospital of Shijiazhuang, Shijiazhuang, Hebei Province, China.
Li FengThe Fourth Hospital of Shijiazhuang, Shijiazhuang, Hebei Province, China.
Qingxue LiThe Fourth Hospital of Shijiazhuang, Shijiazhuang, Hebei Province, China.
Liwei ZhaoDepartment of Oncology, The Fourth Hospital of Shijiazhuang, Shijiazhuang, Hebei Province, China.
Yue LiDepartment of Oncology, The Fourth Hospital of Shijiazhuang, Shijiazhuang, Hebei Province, China.
Ruixiao MaDepartment of Oncology, The Fourth Hospital of Shijiazhuang, Shijiazhuang, Hebei Province, China.
Mengnan ShiDepartment of Oncology, The Fourth Hospital of Shijiazhuang, Shijiazhuang, Hebei Province, China.
Biaogang HanDepartment of Oncology, The Fourth Hospital of Shijiazhuang, Shijiazhuang, Hebei Province, China.
Guorong HaoThe Fourth Hospital of Shijiazhuang, Shijiazhuang, Hebei Province, China.
Lina WangThe Fourth Hospital of Shijiazhuang, Shijiazhuang, Hebei Province, China.
Hui LiThe Fourth Hospital of Shijiazhuang, Shijiazhuang, Hebei Province, China. lihuismile@126.com.
Xiuli WangDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, The Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei Province, China. 27700206@hebmu.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endometrial cancer is the most prevalent form of gynecologic malignancy, with a significant surge in incidence among youngsters. Although the advent of the immunotherapy era has profoundly improved patient outcomes, not all patients benefit from immunotherapy; some patients experience hyperprogression while on immunotherapy. Hence, there is a pressing need to further delineate the distinct immune response profiles in patients with endometrial cancer to enhance prognosis prediction and facilitate the prediction of immunotherapeutic responses. The ssGSEA method was used to evaluate the activities of the immune response pathways in patients with endometrial cancer. Unsupervised clustering was employed to identify the different immune response patterns. WGCNA was employed to identify the genes that highly correlated with the immune response patterns observed. Ninety-five machine learning combinations were utilized to identify the optimal prognosis model and the novel biomarker, SLC38A3. Experiments such as cell invasion, migration, scratch, and in vivo tumorigenicity were performed to determine the function of SLC28A3. Molecular docking techniques were employed to determine the targeted action of periodate-oxidized adenosine on SLC38A3. Patients exhibited both immune response-suppressing C1 phenotypes and immune response-activating C2 phenotypes, with significant differences in prognosis between these two phenotypes. WGCNA identified 418 genes that highly correlated with the immune response phenotypes, of which 69 genes were associated with prognosis. The immune response-related score (IRRS) established by multiple machine learning frameworks demonstrated stability in predicting patient prognosis and immune status. High expression of SLC38A3 contributes to cellular malignant traits, and periodate-oxidized adenosine bound stably to SLC38A3. IRRS accurately predicts disease prognosis and immune status in patients with endometrial cancer. SLC38A3 serves as a prognostic marker for these patients and can be stably targeted by periodate-oxidized adenosine.

Indexed as

Endometrial NeoplasmsMachine LearningAdenosineAnimalsBiomarkers, TumorCell Line, TumorFemaleGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansMolecular Docking SimulationPrognosisAdenosineBiomarkers, TumorEndometrial cancerImmune responseMachine learningPrognosisSLC38A3

Identifiers

PMID39730507
PMCPMC11680691

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.