ArticleScientific reports2024
Association of higher potency statin use with risk of osteoporosis and fractures in patients with stroke in a Korean nationwide cohort study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Polypharmacy and Bone Health in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Narrative Review.Journal of bone metabolism · 2026Article
- High-potency statins are associated with reduced osteoporosis but increased fracture risk in CKD patients: a multi-center retrospective study.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2026Article
- The Relationship Between Problematic Smartphone Use and Time Distortion: The Serial Mediating Effects of Loneliness and Fear of Missing Out.The Psychiatric quarterly · 2025Article
- Trends in statin prescription among osteoporosis patients: A retrospective cohort study using UK primary care data.PLOS global public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This population-based cohort study aimed to evaluate the risk of osteoporosis and fractures associated with higher-potency statin use compared to lower-potency statin use in patients with stroke, using data from the Health Insurance and Review Assessment database of South Korea (2010-2019). Patients who received statin within 30 days after hospitalization for a new-onset stroke (n = 276,911) were divided into higher-potency (n = 212,215, 76.6%) or lower-potency (n = 64,696, 23.4%) statin initiation groups. The primary outcome was a composite of osteoporosis and osteoporotic fractures. Secondary outcomes were individual components of the primary outcome, including osteoporosis, vertebral fracture, hip fracture, and non-hip non-vertebral fracture. Cox proportional hazard models weighted by standardized morbidity ratios were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The risk of the composite outcome (HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.93-0.97), osteoporosis (0.93, 0.90-0.96), vertebral fracture (0.95, 0.91-0.99), and hip fracture (0.89, 0.84-0.95) were significantly lower in higher-potency statin users, while the risk for non-hip non-vertebral fracture was not significant (0.98, 0.95-1.02). The use of higher-potency statins compared to lower-potency statins was associated with a lower risk of osteoporosis, vertebral fracture, and hip fracture in patients with stroke.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.