ArticleScientific reports2024
Extreme learning machine for identifying soil-dwelling microorganisms cultivated on agar media.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The aim of this research is to create an automated system for identifying soil microorganisms at the genera level based on raw microscopic images of monocultural colonies grown in laboratory environment. The examined genera are: Fusarium, Trichoderma, Verticillium, Purpureolicillium and Phytophthora. The proposed pipeline deals with unprocessed microscopic images, avoiding additional sample marking or coloration. The methodology includes several stages: image preprocessing, segmenting images to isolate microorganisms from the background, calculating features related to image color and texture for classification. Using an extensive dataset of 2866 images from the National Institute of Horticultural Research in Skierniewice the Extreme Learning Machine model was trained and validated. The model showcases high accuracy and computational efficiency compared to other Machine Learning state-of-the art methods e.g. CatBoost, Random Forest or Convolutional Neural Networks. Statistical techniques, including Multivariate Analysis of Variance were employed to confirm significant differences among the datasets, enhancing the model's robustness. Nevertheless, Shapley Additive Explanations values provided transparency into the model's decision-making process. This approach has the potential to improve early detection and management of soil pathogens, promoting sustainable agriculture and demonstrating machine learning's potential in environmental monitoring, microbial ecology or industrial microbiology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.