ArticleProbiotics and antimicrobial proteins2025
Differential Regulatory Effects of Probiotics on Bone Metabolism by the Status of Bone Health and Delivery Route.
Article in Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Microbiome-Targeted Probiotic Strategies for the Prevention and Treatment of Osteomyelitis: A Novel Biological Approach.Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Probiotics are known to have favorable effects on human health. Nevertheless, probiotics are not always beneficial and can cause unintended adverse effects such as bacteremia and/or inflammation in immunocompromised patients. In the present study, we investigated the effects of probiotics on the regulation of bone metabolism under different health conditions and delivery routes. Intragastric administration of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum to ovariectomized mouse models for mimicking post-menopausal osteoporosis in humans substantially ameliorated osteoporosis by increasing bone and mineral density. In contrast, such effects did not occur in normal healthy mice under the same condition. Interestingly, however, intraperitoneal administration of L. plantarum induced bone destruction by increasing osteoclast differentiation and decreasing osteoblast differentiation. Furthermore, when L. plantarum was implanted into mouse calvarial bone, it potently augmented bone resorption. Concordantly, L. plantarum upregulated osteoclastogenesis and downregulated osteoblastogenesis in in vitro experiments. These results suggest that L. plantarum can have distinct roles in the regulation of bone metabolism depending on bone health and the delivery route.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.