ArticleScientific reports2024
Phenological and morphological variations of Oryza rufipogon and O. nivara in Sri Lanka and their evolutionary implications.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Phenological and morphological variation are widely viewed as a pivotal driver of ecological adaptation and speciation. Here, we investigate variation patterns of flowering phenology and morphological traits within and between O. rufipogon and O. nivara populations in Sri Lanka by incorporating the in situ observation in natural habitats and manipulative experiments in the common gardens. First, we observed varying degrees of phenological variation under different temporal and spatial conditions, suggesting that flowering phenology of two Oryza species varied depending on both environments and management practices. Particularly, the Sri Lankan O. nivara exhibits high plasticity in flowering phenology, implying that O. nivara might not be an annual in the strict sense. Second, the observation that flowering time of the two species overlapped suggests that the primary factor to maintain the species divergence in Sri Lanka may not be flowering time but rather environments. Third, our selection analysis suggests that interspecific divergence in the traits related to reproduction and habitat preference is adaptive and most likely driven by natural selection. Together, our case study on the Sri Lankan O. rufipogon and O. nivara enhances the understanding of the roles of phenotypic plasticity and environmental factors in the processes of adaptation and speciation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.